Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2152
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.04 (2026)

Confining delinquent child for purposes of preparing social history

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
January 1, 2002
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 179 - 123rd General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

A child who is alleged to be, or who is adjudicated, a delinquent child may be confined in a place of juvenile detention provided under section 2152.41 of the Revised Code for a period not to exceed ninety days, during which time a social history may be prepared to include court record, family history, personal history, school and attendance records, and any other pertinent studies and material that will be of assistance to the juvenile court in its disposition of the charges against that alleged or adjudicated delinquent child.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2003–2020 · leading case: State v. Reed (Slip Opinion), 2020-Ohio-4255, 166 N.E.3d 1106.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Reed (Slip Opinion), 2020-Ohio-4255, 166 N.E.3d 1106. “See R.C. 2152.04 (permitting a juvenile to be confined in a juvenile detention facility for up to 90 days prior to disposition of charges against the juvenile).”
In Re Tiber, 797 N.E.2d 161 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2003). · cites it 2× “Specifically, the state points to R.C. 2152.04, which provides that a' child who is alleged to be or adjudicated delinquent may be confined in a place of juvenile detention for a period not to exceed ninety days.”
State v. B.C.M., 2017-Ohio-1497. “Additionally, R.C. 2152.04 provides that a juvenile alleged to be delinquent may be detained for up to 90 days for the purpose of compiling the juvenile's social history.”
In re M.P.R., 2016-Ohio-3107. “Pursuant to R.C. 2152.04, "[a] child who is alleged to be, or who is adjudicated, a delinquent child may be confined in a place of juvenile detention provided under section 2152.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.