(A) The judges of the general division of the court of common pleas shall appoint two persons, neither of whom shall be an attorney at law nor more than one of whom shall be of the same political party, and either or both of whom may be court employees, to be commissioners of jurors for the county. The appointments shall be made in writing, by the judge or a majority of all the judges in those counties where there is more than one judge, and shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the court of common pleas of the county and entered upon the journal of the court. The commissioners shall hold office at the pleasure of the judges of the court of common pleas in the county of their appointment. The judges may at any time, by a vote of a majority of all their number, remove any commissioner and appoint a successor. Upon a vacancy occurring in the office of commissioners of jurors, for any cause, the judges shall, as soon as practicable, in like manner appoint a successor. The successor so appointed shall be of the same political party as the commissioner whose place is to be filled. The commissioners shall be officers of the courts of common pleas in such county.
(B) The commissioners may examine under oath any juror called for trial as to that person's qualifications to serve as a juror.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1954–2015 · leading case: State v. Williams, 679 N.E.2d 646 (Ohio 1997).
State v. Williams, 679 N.E.2d 646 (Ohio 1997). · cites it 2ד228 , for the proposition that any irregularity that materially affects a substantial right of the defendant and prevents him or her from being tried by a legally constituted jury requires that the verdict be set aside and that a new trial be granted.”
State v. Gunther, 708 N.E.2d 242 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 1998). · cites it 5ד21 requires the above elected officials or their designated representative to certify that the procedures set forth in R.C. 2313.01 to R.C. 2313.46, consisting of the *234 rules governing the entire jury selection process, have been met.”
State v. Williams, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1 (1997). · cites it 2ד228 , for the proposition that any irregularity that materially affects a substantial right of the defendant and prevents him or her from being tried by a legally constituted jury requires that the verdict be set aside and that a new trial be granted.”
State v. Davis, 397 N.E.2d 1215 (Ohio Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 3ד12 provides: “The exemptions of jurors shall be such as are prescribed by sections 2313.01 to 2313.46, inclusive, of the Revised Code, and the general statutes of the state.”
State v. Fulton, 566 N.E.2d 1195 (Ohio 1991). “31(A) (no jury commissioner shall willfully omit to put in the jury list the name of any person qualified for jury duty). Thus, the practice of per se exclusion of Amish individuals from grand jury venires was violative of R.”
State v. Puente, 431 N.E.2d 987 (Ohio 1982). “12 provides: “The exemptions of jurors shall be such as are prescribed by sections 2313.01 to 2313.46, inclusive, of the Revised Code, and the general statutes of the state.”
State v. Lane, 693 N.E.2d 327 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1997). “The officers or their designated representatives shall also certify that sections 2313.01 to 2313.46 of the Revised Code, have been complied with.”
State v. Buell, 504 N.E.2d 1161 (Ohio Ct. App. 12th Dist. 1985). “25 provides that municipal court jurors may be chosen and summoned by the jury commissioners as provided in R.C. 2313.01 to 2313.26. As the Supreme Court stated in Puente, supra, at 139: “* * * R.”
United States v. Nagy, 144 F. Supp. 3d 928 (N.D. Ohio 2015). · cites it 2דB) Jay Joseph Nagy on or about the seventh day of December, 1996, in the County of Summit aforesaid, did commit the crime of AGGRAVATED ROBBERY in that he did, in attempting or committing a theft offense, as defined in Section 2313.01 of the Revised Code, to wit: theft or in…”
State ex rel. Burton v. Smith, 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 429 (Ohio 1963). · cites it 2ד24, inclusive, and Sections 2313.01 to 2313.99, inclusive, of the Revised Code.”
Gibson v. Summers Constr. Co., 119 N.E.2d 637 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1954). “25, Revised Code, styled “Selection and empaneling of a jury,” provides: “A municipal court may provide by rule how jurors shall be chosen, and may provide that jurors to be used in said court may be chosen and summoned by the jury commissioners of the county as provided in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.