Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2313
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.13 (2026)

Race or color shall not disqualify a juror

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
May 22, 2012
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 268 - 129th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

No officer or other person charged with a duty in compiling the jury source list or the annual jury list or summoning jurors shall exclude or fail to summon a citizen as a grand or petit juror on account of race or color, provided such citizen possesses all other qualifications required by law for jurors.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: SHJ Co. v. Avani Hosp. & Fin., L.L.C., 2022-Ohio-1173, 187 N.E.3d 1121.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
SHJ Co. v. Avani Hosp. & Fin., L.L.C., 2022-Ohio-1173, 187 N.E.3d 1121. · cites it 3× “No Requirement for Evidentiary Hearing Appellants claim that the trial court erred in failing to hold a hearing pursuant to R.C. 2313.13(E) to determine the nature of the cognovit note — commercial or consumer — and failed to hold a hearing on their motion to vacate motion for…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.13(E): 1 case
SHJ Co. v. Avani Hosp. & Fin., L.L.C., 2022-Ohio-1173, 187 N.E.3d 1121. “No Requirement for Evidentiary Hearing Appellants claim that the trial court erred in failing to hold a hearing pursuant to R.C. 2313.13(E) to determine the nature of the cognovit note — commercial or consumer — and failed to hold a hearing on their motion to vacate motion for…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.13(E)(1): 1 case
SHJ Co. v. Avani Hosp. & Fin., L.L.C., 2022-Ohio-1173, 187 N.E.3d 1121. “No Requirement for Evidentiary Hearing Appellants claim that the trial court erred in failing to hold a hearing pursuant to R.C. 2313.13(E) to determine the nature of the cognovit note — commercial or consumer — and failed to hold a hearing on their motion to vacate motion for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.