Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2707
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2707.02 (2026)

Notice of motion for amercement

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 1, 1953
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 1 - 100th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

If the officer resides in the county in which the motion mentioned in section 2707.01 of the Revised Code is made, notice shall be served upon him at least two days before it is heard. If he is an officer of another county, the notice shall be served upon him, or left at his office, at least fifteen days before the first day of the term at which the motion will be heard, or sent to him by mail at least sixty days before such day.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2023 · leading case: State v. Sims, 2023-Ohio-1179, 212 N.E.3d 458.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Sims, 2023-Ohio-1179, 212 N.E.3d 458. · cites it 2× “{¶140} Therefore, we do not agree with appellant that his R.C. 2707.02(A)(1)(c) conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence.”
Myers v. Hadsell Chem. Processing, L.L.C., 2019-Ohio-2982. “R.C. 2707.02 merely permits Sheriff Reader to pursue subrogation in the amount he is amerced.”
Ryan v. Carter, 621 N.E.2d 399 (Ohio 1993). · cites it 2× “The statute provides: “If an execution or order of sale directed to an officer comes to his hands to be executed, and he neglects or refuses to execute it * * *, on motion in court, and notice thereof, in writing, as provided in section 2707.02 of the Revised Code, such officer…”
Ryan v. Carter, 1993 Ohio 168 (Ohio 1993). · cites it 2× “The statute provides: "If an execution or order of sale directed to an officer comes to his hands to be executed, and he neglects or refuses to execute it ***, on motion in court, and notice thereof, in writing, as provided in section 2707.02 of the Revised Code, such officer…”
William P. Bringman Co., LPA v. Blubaugh, 2013-Ohio-4672. “Ultimately, after some procedural hiccups,1 the trial court denied appellant's motion for amercement because it did not comply with the service requirement under R.C. 2707.02. Appellant then appealed. Appellee moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final, appealable order.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2707.02(A)(1)(c): 1 case
State v. Sims, 2023-Ohio-1179, 212 N.E.3d 458. “{¶140} Therefore, we do not agree with appellant that his R.C. 2707.02(A)(1)(c) conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.