Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2711.06 (2026)

Powers and duties of arbitrators - subpoena of witnesses, failure to obey

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When more than one arbitrator is agreed to, all the arbitrators shall sit at the hearing of the controversy unless, by consent in writing, all parties agree to proceed with the hearing with a less number. The arbitrators selected either as prescribed in sections 2711.01 to 2711.15, inclusive, of the Revised Code, or otherwise, or a majority of them, may administer oaths or affirmations to witnesses, fix the time and place of their hearings, adjourn their meetings from day to day or for a longer time, and also from place to place, and may subpoena in writing any person to attend before any of them as a witness and in a proper case to bring with him any book, record, document, or paper which is deemed material as evidence in the case. The fees for such attendance shall be the same as the fees of witnesses in the court of common pleas. The subpoena shall issue in the name of the arbitrators, or a majority of them, and shall be signed by the arbitrators, or a majority of them, and shall be directed to said person and shall be served in the same manner as subpoenas to appear and testify before such court. If any person so subpoenaed to testify refuses or neglects to obey such subpoena, upon petition, the court of common pleas in the county in which such arbitrators, or a majority of them, are sitting may compel the attendance of such person before said arbitrators, or punish said person for contempt in the same manner provided for securing the attendance of witnesses or their punishment for neglect or refusal to attend in such court.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1981–2017 · leading case: Stratso v. Song, 477 N.E.2d 1176 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stratso v. Song, 477 N.E.2d 1176 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1984). · cites it 3× “) Thus, the central issue is whether the decision of the arbitrators was made in accordance with R.C. 2711.06 to 2711.16, insofar as they are applicable, and R.”
Schaefer v. Allstate Ins., 590 N.E.2d 1242 (Ohio 1992). “In contrast to mediation, where the parties are guided to solve their problems on their own, arbitration provides the parties with a definitive view by a neutral third party of the merits of their conflict, after a full hearing that can include testimony under oath, R.C.…”
Beatty v. Akron City Hosp., 424 N.E.2d 586 (Ohio 1981). ““(B) The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with sections 2711.06 to 2711.16 of the Revised Code insofar as they are applicable.”
Youngstown State Univ. v. Youngstown State Univ. Assn. of Classified Emps., 2013-Ohio-5862. · cites it 3× “Unrelated to R.C. 2711.06, there are arbitration statutes which provide the right to appeal from certain orders concerning arbitration.”
Centofanti. v. Wayne Homes, 2012-Ohio-4116. “R.C. 2711.06. -8- {¶14} When a claim is brought in court and a party to the suit seeks to end or stay the proceeding by claiming that the matter should instead be submitted to arbitration, “prior to making any determination regarding the arbitrability of any issue raised by the…”
Shakoor v. VXI Global Solutions, Inc., 2017-Ohio-8018. “R.C. 2711.06 covers subpoenas of witnesses for arbitration proceedings and provides, in pertinent part: * * *If any person so subpoenaed to testify refuses or neglects to obey such subpoena, upon petition, the court of common pleas in the county in which such arbitrators, or a…”
State ex rel. Glass v. Reid, 575 N.E.2d 516 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1991). ““(B) The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with sections 2711.06 to 2711.16 of the Revised Code insofar as they are applicable.”
Wells v. Dutta, 536 N.E.2d 674 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1987). · cites it 2× “21 “shall be conducted in accordance with sections 2711.06 to 2711.16 of the Revised Code insofar as they are applicable.”
McBride v. Manthey, 530 N.E.2d 952 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1987). “21, as it existed at the time of the trial court’s judgment, provided in relevant part: “(A) Upon the filing of any medical claim * * * the controversy shall be submitted to an arbitration board “(B) The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with sections…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.