Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2713.22 (2026)

Bail may arrest defendant

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For the purpose of surrendering the defendant, the bail may arrest him at any time or place before he is finally charged, or, by a written authority indorsed on a certified copy of the bond, may empower any person of suitable age and discretion to do so.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2001–2012 · leading case: State v. Kole, 750 N.E.2d 148 (Ohio 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Kole, 750 N.E.2d 148 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 11× “*306 R.C. 2713.22 provides: “For the purpose of surrendering the defendant, the bail may arrest him at any time or place before he is finally charged, or, by a written authority indorsed on a certified copy of the bond, may empower any person of suitable age and discretion to do…”
Mota v. Gruszczynski, 2012 Ohio 275 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 9× “*755 Relevance of Bounty-Hunter Statute, R.C. 2713.22, to Criminal Trespass, as Defined in R.”
State v. Kole, 2001 Ohio 191 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 11× “{¶ 13} R.C. 2713.22 provides: “For the purpose of surrendering the defendant, the bail may arrest him at any time or place before he is finally charged, or, by a written authority indorsed on a certified copy of the bond, may empower any person of suitable age and discretion to…”
Commonwealth v. Cabral, 819 N.E.2d 951 (Mass. 2005). “80 (McKinney 1995) (permitting surety “by a written authority indorsed on a certified copy of the bail bond,” to “empower any person over twenty years of age” to surrender principal); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2713.22 (West 1994) (permitting surety “by a written authority indorsed…”
State v. Bryant, 2012 Ohio 3909 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “{¶29} Although trial counsel raised a common law privilege in defense to the charges, that privilege was narrower than the statutory privilege that R.C. 2713.22 provided a bail-bonding agent to surrender a defendant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.