Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2725.26 (2026)

Record of writs

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The proceedings upon a writ of habeas corpus must be recorded by the clerk of the court in which such proceedings were had, and may be reviewed on appeal as in other cases.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1956–2024 · leading case: Ruther v. Sweeney, 137 N.E.2d 292 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1956).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ruther v. Sweeney, 137 N.E.2d 292 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1956). · cites it 4× “It must follow that, being a collateral remedy that is not a part of the extradition proceeding and which is civil in character, with an appeal provided for as in other cases (§2725.26 R. C.), that when an appeal is taken the procedure in civil cases must be followed.”
Hudlin v. Alexander, 586 N.E.2d 86 (Ohio 1992). · cites it 2× “R.C. 2725.26 provides for appeal of habeas corpus cases.”
In re Ross, 796 N.E.2d 6 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2003). “R.C. 2725.26; Horton v. Collins (1992), 83 Ohio App.”
Horton v. Collins, 614 N.E.2d 1077 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1992). “R.C. 2725.26. As the trial court granted the respondent-appellee a summary judgment, we review this decision as we would any other civil summary judgment.”
Maurent v. Foley, 2024-Ohio-2476. “Decisions to grant habeas corpus are now subject to appellate review pursuant to R.C. 2725.26. {¶17} In this case, I would first find that the case is not moot.”
State ex rel. Callahan v. Eppinger, 2020-Ohio-4345. “” R.C. 2725.26. This Court reviews a trial court’s decision to grant a motion to dismiss de novo.”
Bridges v. Gray, 2023-Ohio-1661. “Any writ issued by a court or judge of another county to an officer or person in charge at the state institution to compel the production or discharge of an inmate thereof is void.”
White v. Maxwell, 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 186 (Ohio 1963). · cites it 2× “He bases his demand on Section 2725.26, Revised Code, which reads as follows: “The proceedings upon a writ of habeas corpus must be recorded by the clerk of the court in which such proceedings were had, and may be reviewed on appeal as in other cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.