Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2901.011 (2026)

Reagan Tokes Law

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The amendments to sections 109.42, 121.22, 149.43, 2903.06, 2903.08, 2903.11, 2903.12, 2905.01, 2905.32, 2907.02, 2907.03, 2907.05, 2907.07, 2919.22, 2919.25, 2921.321, 2921.36, 2923.132, 2925.01, 2925.02, 2925.03, 2925.04, 2925.041, 2925.11, 2929.01, 2929.14, 2929.142, 2929.15, 2929.19, 2929.191, 2929.20, 2929.61, 2930.16, 2943.032, 2953.08, 2967.01, 2967.021, 2967.03, 2967.13, 2967.191, 2967.193, 2967.26, 2967.28, 2971.03, 3719.99, 5120.021, 5120.53, 5120.66, and 5120.80 and to former section 2967.19 and the enactment of sections 2901.011, 2929.144, 2967.271, and 5120.038 of the Revised Code by S.B. 201 of the 132nd general assembly constitute the Reagan Tokes Law.

Last updated March 8, 2023 at 11:15 AM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 86 cases (83 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: State v. Delvallie, 2022-Ohio-470, 185 N.E.3d 536.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Delvallie, 2022-Ohio-470, 185 N.E.3d 536. · cites it 6× “The Reagan Tokes Law under R.C. 2901.011,1 however, is a statutorily defined term of art that includes 54 statutory sections, including an amendment of 50 existing statutory sections and the adoption of four new statutes.”
State v. Reed, 2021-Ohio-1623. · cites it 9× “{¶22} On appeal, Reed primarily relies upon R.C. 2901.011, which states in its entirety: The amendments to sections 109.”
State v. Eaton, 2022-Ohio-2432, 192 N.E.3d 1236. · cites it 3× “201, identified under R.C. 2901.011 as the Reagan Tokes Law, is unconstitutional because it violates the separation-of-powers doctrine and infringes upon his due process rights.”
State v. Foster, 2021-Ohio-1454. · cites it 9× “4 On appeal, Foster cites R.C. 2901.011 as the sole basis for this contention.”
State v. Leet, 2020-Ohio-4592. “R.C. 2901.011. Under the law, qualifying first- and second-degree felonies committed on or after March 22, 2019 are now subject to the imposition of indefinite sentences.”
State v. Barnes, 2020-Ohio-4150. “R.C. 2901.011. Under the law, qualifying first- and second-degree felonies committed on or after March 22, 2019 are now subject to the imposition of indefinite sentences.”
State v. Wilburn, 2021-Ohio-578, 168 N.E.3d 873. “See R.C. 2901.011. Under the law, qualifying first- and second- degree felonies committed on or after March 22, 2019, are subject to the imposition of indefinite sentences.”
State v. Hiles, 2021-Ohio-1622. · cites it 10× “{¶13} As the sole basis for his contention, Hiles cites to R.C. 2901.011, which he claims lists the felonies that are qualifying felonies of the first or second degree.”
State v. Simmons, 2021-Ohio-939, 169 N.E.3d 728. “Specifically, when imposing prison terms for offenders with first- or second-degree felony offenses, sentencing courts are to impose an indefinite sentence, imposing a stated minimum sentence as provided in R.”
State v. Velliquette, 2020-Ohio-4855, 160 N.E.3d 414. “{¶ 26} In his second assignment of error, appellant argues that R.C. 2967.271, the Reagan Tokes law reinstituting indefinite sentences, is unconstitutional as a violation of the separation of powers doctrine and his due process rights.”
State v. Harris, 2023-Ohio-3994, 227 N.E.3d 510. “R.C. 2901.011. In general, the law provides that first-degree and second-degree felonies not already carrying a life sentence are subject to an indefinite sentencing scheme.”
State v. Bontrager, 2022-Ohio-1367, 188 N.E.3d 607. “R.C. 2901.011. Relevant here, the Reagan Tokes Law requires that a court imposing a prison term under R.”
Show all 86 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.