Notes of Decisions
Cited in
393
cases (
152 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case:
City of Akron v. Callaway, 835 N.E.2d 736 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
City of Akron v. Callaway, 835 N.E.2d 736 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 15× “13 [resisting arrest], as it conflicts with R.C. § 2921.33 in permitting convictions where the arrest was not proven to be lawful.”
State v. McCrone, 580 N.E.2d 468 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).
· cites it 10× “Assignment of Error 2 “The trial court erred in failing to grant defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of resisting arrest (O.R.C. 2921.33) at the conclusion of all evidence.”
State v. Harvey, 2020 Ohio 329 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 4× “{¶7} On November 20, 2018, Harvey was charged with one count of resisting arrest in violation of R.C. 2921.33(A); one count of obstructing official business in violation of R.”
State v. Madding, 2011 Ohio 3865 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 21× “Neither the name nor the identity of the offense of resisting arrest in violation of R.C. 2921.33 was changed when the Revised Code designation in the complaint was amended.”
State v. Johnson, 453 N.E.2d 1101 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 7× “That court, at page 256, noted the appropriate standard for a “lawful arrest,” to wit: “* * * If the facts surrounding Ms.”
State v. Terry, 2016 Ohio 3484 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 4× “31, and without this charge there can be no validity to the charge of resisting arrest, R.C. 2921.33.” Terry’s first argument here focuses on the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction for obstructing official business.”
State v. Armstrong-Carter, 2021 Ohio 1110 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 6× “* * * “ ‘ [T]he absence of excessive or unnecessary force is not a material element of the crime of resisting arrest as defined in R.C. 2921.33.’ ” [Blanchester v. Newland, 12th Dist.”
City of Elyria v. Tress, 595 N.E.2d 1031 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 6× “19(A)(1), and resisting arrest, R.C. 2921.33(A). Shortly after 11:00 p.m.”
Lamar Wright v. City of Euclid, 962 F.3d 852 (6th Cir. 2020).
“2018); see Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(A) (“No person, recklessly or by force, shall resist or interfere with a lawful arrest .”
State v. Fussell, 2011 Ohio 4815 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 10× “Because there is insufficient evidence establishing that Fussell caused Officer Telegdy’s injury, we must address Fussell’s conviction for resisting arrest in violation of R.”
State v. Pierce, 2017 Ohio 4223 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 3× “31(A) and resisting arrest in violation of R.C. 2921.33(A). Doc. 1, 2. The jury trial was set for November 2, 2016.”
Mansfield v. Studer, 2012 Ohio 4840 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 3× “2011-CA-93 & 2011-CA-94 29 {¶89} With regard to the resisting arrest charge, the elements are set forth in R.C. 2921.33, which provides in pertinent part, “(A) No person, recklessly or by force, shall resist or interfere with a lawful arrest of the person or another.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(A) — 226 cases
State v. Harvey, 2020 Ohio 329 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
“{¶7} On November 20, 2018, Harvey was charged with one count of resisting arrest in violation of R.C. 2921.33(A); one count of obstructing official business in violation of R.”
State v. McCrone, 580 N.E.2d 468 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).
“Assignment of Error 2 “The trial court erred in failing to grant defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of resisting arrest (O.R.C. 2921.33) at the conclusion of all evidence.”
City of Elyria v. Tress, 595 N.E.2d 1031 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991).
“19(A)(1), and resisting arrest, R.C. 2921.33(A). Shortly after 11:00 p.m.”
Lamar Wright v. City of Euclid, 962 F.3d 852 (6th Cir. 2020).
“2018); see Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(A) (“No person, recklessly or by force, shall resist or interfere with a lawful arrest .”
State v. Armstrong-Carter, 2021 Ohio 1110 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
“* * * “ ‘ [T]he absence of excessive or unnecessary force is not a material element of the crime of resisting arrest as defined in R.C. 2921.33.’ ” [Blanchester v. Newland, 12th Dist.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(A)(1) — 2 cases
State v. Madding, 2011 Ohio 3865 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
“Neither the name nor the identity of the offense of resisting arrest in violation of R.C. 2921.33 was changed when the Revised Code designation in the complaint was amended.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(A)(D) — 3 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(B) — 53 cases
State v. Madding, 2011 Ohio 3865 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
“Neither the name nor the identity of the offense of resisting arrest in violation of R.C. 2921.33 was changed when the Revised Code designation in the complaint was amended.”
State v. Fussell, 2011 Ohio 4815 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
“Because there is insufficient evidence establishing that Fussell caused Officer Telegdy’s injury, we must address Fussell’s conviction for resisting arrest in violation of R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(B)(C) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(B)(D) — 2 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(B)(c)(5)(a) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(C) — 3 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(C)(1) — 6 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(C)(2) — 7 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(C)(5)(a)(ii) — 2 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(D) — 6 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(E) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(O) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.33(a) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.