Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331 (2026)

Failure to comply with order or signal of police officer

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) No person shall fail to comply with any lawful order or direction of any police officer invested with authority to direct, control, or regulate traffic.

(B) No person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a police officer to bring the person's motor vehicle to a stop.

(C)(1) Whoever violates this section is guilty of failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer.

(2) A violation of division (A) of this section is a misdemeanor of the first degree.

(3) Except as provided in divisions (C)(4) and (5) of this section, a violation of division (B) of this section is a felony of the fourth degree.

(4) A violation of division (B) of this section is a felony of the third degree if the jury or judge as trier of fact finds by proof beyond a reasonable doubt that, in committing the offense, the offender was fleeing immediately after the commission of a felony.

(5)(a) A violation of division (B) of this section is a felony of the third degree if the jury or judge as trier of fact finds any of the following by proof beyond a reasonable doubt:

(i) The operation of the motor vehicle by the offender was a proximate cause of serious physical harm to persons or property.

(ii) The operation of the motor vehicle by the offender caused a substantial risk of serious physical harm to persons or property.

(b) If a police officer pursues an offender who is violating division (B) of this section and division (C)(5)(a) of this section applies, the sentencing court, in determining the seriousness of an offender's conduct for purposes of sentencing the offender for a violation of division (B) of this section, shall consider, along with the factors set forth in sections 2929.12 and 2929.13 of the Revised Code that are required to be considered, all of the following:

(i) The duration of the pursuit;

(ii) The distance of the pursuit;

(iii) The rate of speed at which the offender operated the motor vehicle during the pursuit;

(iv) Whether the offender failed to stop for traffic lights or stop signs during the pursuit;

(v) The number of traffic lights or stop signs for which the offender failed to stop during the pursuit;

(vi) Whether the offender operated the motor vehicle during the pursuit without lighted lights during a time when lighted lights are required;

(vii) Whether the offender committed a moving violation during the pursuit;

(viii) The number of moving violations the offender committed during the pursuit;

(ix) Any other relevant factors indicating that the offender's conduct is more serious than conduct normally constituting the offense.

(D) If an offender is sentenced to a prison term for a violation of division (B) of this section, the offender shall serve the prison term consecutively to any other prison term or mandatory prison term imposed upon the offender.

(E) In addition to any other sanction imposed for a violation of division (B) of this section, the court shall impose a class two suspension from the range specified in division (A)(2) of section 4510.02 of the Revised Code. In addition to any other sanction imposed for a violation of division (A) of this section, the court shall impose a class five suspension from the range specified in division (A)(5) of section 4510.02 of the Revised Code. If the offender previously has been found guilty of an offense under this section, in addition to any other sanction imposed for the offense, the court shall impose a class one suspension as described in division (A)(1) of that section. The court shall not grant limited driving privileges to the offender on a suspension imposed for a felony violation of this section. The court may grant limited driving privileges to the offender on a suspension imposed for a misdemeanor violation of this section as set forth in section 4510.021 of the Revised Code. No judge shall suspend the first three years of suspension under a class two suspension of an offender's license, permit, or privilege required by this division or any portion of the suspension under a class one suspension of an offender's license, permit, or privilege required by this division.

(F) As used in this section:

(1) "Moving violation" has the same meaning as in section 2743.70 of the Revised Code.

(2) "Police officer" has the same meaning as in section 4511.01 of the Revised Code.

Last updated February 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 723 cases (357 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). · cites it 105× “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Liddy, 2022 Ohio 4282 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 41× “2022-A-0041 Failure To Comply {¶31} Failure to comply is governed by R.C. 2921.331. R.C. 2921.331(B) provides that “[n]o person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a police officer to…”
State v. Fairbanks, 117 Ohio St. 3d 543 (Ohio 2008). · cites it 40× “” *547 {¶ 14} The section of the Revised Code at issue in this case, R.C. 2921.331, specifies the degree of culpability as willful: “No person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a…”
State v. Heidelberg, 2019 Ohio 2257 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 22× “87518, 2006-Ohio-5024, ¶ 16 (rejecting defendant’s position that trial court was authorized to impose lifetime license suspension only for an actual violation of R.C. 2921.331, and not for an attempt to violate this statute).”
State v. Parker, 2018 Ohio 579 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 25× “{¶4} On April 18, 2006, a grand jury indicted Parker with a two-count indictment in CR-06-479730-A: Count 1, failure to comply with order or signal of police, in violation of R.C. 2921.331 with a furthermore clause, a felony of the third degree; and Count 2, felonious assault,…”
State v. Garrard, 867 N.E.2d 887 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 15× “11; and (3) failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer (“fleeing”), in violation of R.C. 2921.331. Ordinarily, under R.C. 2921.”
State v. Wingate, 2020 Ohio 6796 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 19× “CT2003-0025, 2003-Ohio-7274, ¶ 44 (finding that the record demonstrated that the trial court considered the R.C. 2921.331 sentencing factors where it “discuss[ed] some of them” and noted that “the probation officer testified -14- Case No.”
State v. Brooks, 2023 Ohio 2978 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 13× “{¶ 30} The Ohio Supreme Court has recognized that “R.C. 2921.331(A) and (B) describe separate violations; R.”
State v. Craig, 2018 Ohio 1987 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 17× “The statute provides in pertinent part: Licking County, Case No. 17-CA-61 6 (A) No person shall fail to comply with any lawful order or direction of any police officer invested with authority to direct, control, or regulate traffic.”
State v. Hendershot, 2017 Ohio 8112 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 12× “CT 2016-0061 3 and one count of failure to comply (risk of harm) in violation of R.C. 2921.331(B), a felony of the third degree.”
State v. Garner, 2012 Ohio 3262 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 16× “Appellant asserts that because he was convicted of attempted failure to comply, rather than failure to comply, the sentencing provisions of R.C. 2921.331 do not apply to him, and the general sentencing statute, R.”
City of Cleveland v. Krebs, 2018 Ohio 746 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 26× “331(B) was a separate offense (requiring the state to prove that the defendant acted willfully), there was “no plain indication in R.C. 2921.331 of an intent to impose strict liability.”
Show all 723 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(A) — 56 cases
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Thigpen, 2016 Ohio 1374 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
City of Cleveland v. Krebs, 2018 Ohio 746 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “331(B) was a separate offense (requiring the state to prove that the defendant acted willfully), there was “no plain indication in R.C. 2921.331 of an intent to impose strict liability.”
State v. Brewer, 645 N.E.2d 120 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
Argabrite v. Neer, 2016 Ohio 8374 (Ohio 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B) — 522 cases
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Fairbanks, 117 Ohio St. 3d 543 (Ohio 2008). “” *547 {¶ 14} The section of the Revised Code at issue in this case, R.C. 2921.331, specifies the degree of culpability as willful: “No person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a…”
State v. Liddy, 2022 Ohio 4282 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “2022-A-0041 Failure To Comply {¶31} Failure to comply is governed by R.C. 2921.331. R.C. 2921.331(B) provides that “[n]o person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a police officer to…”
State v. Nicholson, 2022 Ohio 2037 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Brooks, 2023 Ohio 2978 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “{¶ 30} The Ohio Supreme Court has recognized that “R.C. 2921.331(A) and (B) describe separate violations; R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(3) — 1 case
State v. Wooden, 619 N.E.2d 1132 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(4) — 1 case
State v. Snelling, 2011 Ohio 3222 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(5) — 1 case
State v. Cargill, 2013 Ohio 2689 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(5)(a)(ii) — 4 cases
State v. Hendershot, 2017 Ohio 8112 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “CT 2016-0061 3 and one count of failure to comply (risk of harm) in violation of R.C. 2921.331(B), a felony of the third degree.”
State v. Pleasant, 2025 Ohio 115 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
State v. Snelling, 2011 Ohio 3222 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Hilton, 2016 Ohio 8219 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(C) — 1 case
State v. Brooks, 2023 Ohio 1631 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(C)(1)(4) — 1 case
State v. Vari, 2010 Ohio 1300 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(C)(1)(5) — 1 case
State v. Oliver, 2010 Ohio 4182 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(C)(3) — 3 cases
State v. Terry, 719 N.E.2d 1046 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).
State v. Cox, 2017 Ohio 5550 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Head, 2026 Ohio 700 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(C)(4) — 3 cases
State v. Howard, 2012 Ohio 2836 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Atkins, 2012 Ohio 4744 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Brooks, 2023 Ohio 1631 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(C)(5) — 1 case
State v. Davis, 2023 Ohio 867 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(C)(5)(a) — 30 cases
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Craig, 2018 Ohio 1987 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “The statute provides in pertinent part: Licking County, Case No. 17-CA-61 6 (A) No person shall fail to comply with any lawful order or direction of any police officer invested with authority to direct, control, or regulate traffic.”
State v. Nicholson, 2016 Ohio 50 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Christian, 2014 Ohio 2590 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Brown, 2013 Ohio 5515 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(B)(C)(5)(b) — 2 cases
State v. Nicholson, 2016 Ohio 50 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Walker, 2025 Ohio 2649 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C) — 11 cases
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Glover, 2023 Ohio 1153 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
State v. Lovelace, 738 N.E.2d 418 (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).
State v. Karle, 759 N.E.2d 815 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).
State v. Moore, 2023 Ohio 1904 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(1) — 5 cases
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Mays, 2024 Ohio 4616 (Ohio 2024).
State v. Liddy, 2022 Ohio 4282 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “2022-A-0041 Failure To Comply {¶31} Failure to comply is governed by R.C. 2921.331. R.C. 2921.331(B) provides that “[n]o person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a police officer to…”
State v. Washington, 2014 Ohio 1876 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Chatman, 2023 Ohio 1590 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(2) — 5 cases
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Lovelace, 738 N.E.2d 418 (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).
State v. McDonald, 2012 Ohio 1528 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Hinds, 2024 Ohio 6042 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Smith, 2024 Ohio 3344 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(3) — 26 cases
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Semenchuk, 701 N.E.2d 19 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Hasenyager, 2016 Ohio 3540 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Smith, 905 N.E.2d 151 (Ohio 2009).
State v. Liddy, 2022 Ohio 4282 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “2022-A-0041 Failure To Comply {¶31} Failure to comply is governed by R.C. 2921.331. R.C. 2921.331(B) provides that “[n]o person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a police officer to…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(4) — 26 cases
Argabrite v. Neer, 2016 Ohio 8374 (Ohio 2016).
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Liddy, 2022 Ohio 4282 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “2022-A-0041 Failure To Comply {¶31} Failure to comply is governed by R.C. 2921.331. R.C. 2921.331(B) provides that “[n]o person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a police officer to…”
State v. Cargill, 2013 Ohio 2689 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Heidelberg, 2019 Ohio 2257 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “87518, 2006-Ohio-5024, ¶ 16 (rejecting defendant’s position that trial court was authorized to impose lifetime license suspension only for an actual violation of R.C. 2921.331, and not for an attempt to violate this statute).”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5) — 17 cases
State v. Hatfield, 2022 Ohio 148 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Jefferson, 2019 Ohio 156 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
State v. Feathers, 2021 Ohio 2881 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Wells, 2013 Ohio 5821 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Standifer, 2022 Ohio 2426 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(A)(ii) — 1 case
State v. Wright, 2024 Ohio 78 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(B) — 1 case
State v. Dennison, 2012 Ohio 1119 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(a) — 22 cases
State v. Smith, 905 N.E.2d 151 (Ohio 2009).
State v. Fairbanks, 117 Ohio St. 3d 543 (Ohio 2008). “” *547 {¶ 14} The section of the Revised Code at issue in this case, R.C. 2921.331, specifies the degree of culpability as willful: “No person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a…”
State v. Feathers, 2021 Ohio 2881 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Smith, 2022 Ohio 2565 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Strong, 2018 Ohio 5289 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(a)(i) — 13 cases
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Glover, 2017 Ohio 7360 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Liddy, 2022 Ohio 4282 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “2022-A-0041 Failure To Comply {¶31} Failure to comply is governed by R.C. 2921.331. R.C. 2921.331(B) provides that “[n]o person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a police officer to…”
State v. Barnhart, 2023 Ohio 3488 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
State v. Eldridge, 2023 Ohio 3998 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(a)(ii) — 92 cases
State v. McDonald, 2013 Ohio 5042 (Ohio 2013). “{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.”
State v. Fairbanks, 117 Ohio St. 3d 543 (Ohio 2008). “” *547 {¶ 14} The section of the Revised Code at issue in this case, R.C. 2921.331, specifies the degree of culpability as willful: “No person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a…”
State v. Garrard, 867 N.E.2d 887 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “11; and (3) failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer (“fleeing”), in violation of R.C. 2921.331. Ordinarily, under R.C. 2921.”
State v. Hasenyager, 2016 Ohio 3540 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Zitney, 2021 Ohio 466 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(a)(iii) — 1 case
State v. Montgomery, 2022 Ohio 4273 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(b) — 36 cases
State v. Wingate, 2020 Ohio 6796 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “CT2003-0025, 2003-Ohio-7274, ¶ 44 (finding that the record demonstrated that the trial court considered the R.C. 2921.331 sentencing factors where it “discuss[ed] some of them” and noted that “the probation officer testified -14- Case No.”
State v. Farr, 2023 Ohio 4704 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
State v. Jordan, 2011 Ohio 6015 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Webb, 2024 Ohio 4862 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Rochester, 2024 Ohio 5306 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(b)(i) — 10 cases
State v. Wingate, 2020 Ohio 6796 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “CT2003-0025, 2003-Ohio-7274, ¶ 44 (finding that the record demonstrated that the trial court considered the R.C. 2921.331 sentencing factors where it “discuss[ed] some of them” and noted that “the probation officer testified -14- Case No.”
State v. Standifer, 2022 Ohio 2426 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Jordan, 2011 Ohio 6015 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Webb, 2024 Ohio 4862 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Costello, 2017 Ohio 294 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(b)(iii) — 1 case
State v. Dennison, 2012 Ohio 1119 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(b)(ix) — 1 case
State v. Dennison, 2012 Ohio 1119 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(b)(vi) — 1 case
State v. Wingate, 2020 Ohio 6796 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “CT2003-0025, 2003-Ohio-7274, ¶ 44 (finding that the record demonstrated that the trial court considered the R.C. 2921.331 sentencing factors where it “discuss[ed] some of them” and noted that “the probation officer testified -14- Case No.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(b)(vii) — 1 case
State v. Dennison, 2012 Ohio 1119 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(C)(5)(ii) — 1 case
State v. Hookfin, 2025 Ohio 5547 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(D) — 92 cases
State v. Parker, 2018 Ohio 579 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “{¶4} On April 18, 2006, a grand jury indicted Parker with a two-count indictment in CR-06-479730-A: Count 1, failure to comply with order or signal of police, in violation of R.C. 2921.331 with a furthermore clause, a felony of the third degree; and Count 2, felonious assault,…”
State v. Liddy, 2022 Ohio 4282 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “2022-A-0041 Failure To Comply {¶31} Failure to comply is governed by R.C. 2921.331. R.C. 2921.331(B) provides that “[n]o person shall operate a motor vehicle so as willfully to elude or flee a police officer after receiving a visible or audible signal from a police officer to…”
State v. Wells, 2013 Ohio 5821 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Willard, 2021 Ohio 2552 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Cover, 2021 Ohio 1303 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(E) — 31 cases
State v. Heidelberg, 2019 Ohio 2257 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “87518, 2006-Ohio-5024, ¶ 16 (rejecting defendant’s position that trial court was authorized to impose lifetime license suspension only for an actual violation of R.C. 2921.331, and not for an attempt to violate this statute).”
State v. Gove, 2025 Ohio 701 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
State v. Chatman, 2023 Ohio 1590 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
State v. Hendershot, 2017 Ohio 8112 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “CT 2016-0061 3 and one count of failure to comply (risk of harm) in violation of R.C. 2921.331(B), a felony of the third degree.”
State v. Parker, 2018 Ohio 579 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “{¶4} On April 18, 2006, a grand jury indicted Parker with a two-count indictment in CR-06-479730-A: Count 1, failure to comply with order or signal of police, in violation of R.C. 2921.331 with a furthermore clause, a felony of the third degree; and Count 2, felonious assault,…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(F) — 1 case
State v. Hersi, 2018 Ohio 123 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(F)(2) — 3 cases
State v. Schwable, 2009 Ohio 6523 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Hersi, 2018 Ohio 123 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
State v. O'Day, 2024 Ohio 1654 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(a) — 1 case
State v. Covey, 2012 Ohio 4728 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.331(b)(c)(5)(a) — 1 case
State v. Faulkner, 2018 Ohio 3824 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.