Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2941.32 (2026)

Two or more indictments pending

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If two or more indictments or informations are pending against the same defendant for the same criminal act, the prosecuting attorney must elect upon which he will proceed, and upon trial being had upon one of them, the remaining indictments or information shall be quashed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1962–2018 · leading case: State v. Luff, 621 N.E.2d 493 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Luff, 621 N.E.2d 493 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993). “On August 31,1990, Luff filed a motion pursuant to R.C. 2941.32 to require the state to elect between case Nos.”
In re J.Y. A Minior Child, 2018 Ohio 2405 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “R.C. 2941.32 states that if "two or more indictments or informations are pending against the same defendant for the same criminal act, the prosecuting attorney must elect upon which he [or she] will proceed, and upon trial being had upon one of them, the remaining indictments or…”
State v. Porter, 603 N.E.2d 378 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992). “Although these constitute separate offenses, only one sentence may be imposed for convictions under the subsections because these offenses *802 are allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2941.32. State v. Mendieta (1984), 20 Ohio App.”
Rodriguez v. Sacks, 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 456 (Ohio 1962). · cites it 2× “Petitioner urges first that he was sentenced on six consecutive counts for the same offense, contrary to the provisions of Section 2941.32, Revised Code, which provides as follows: “If two or more indictments or informations are pending against the same defendant for the same…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.