Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2943
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2943.01 (2026)

Arraignment and plea definitions

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 1, 1953
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 1 - 100th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

The definition of "magistrate" set forth in section 2931.01 of the Revised Code applies to Chapter 2943. of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2013–2024 · leading case: State v. Lamb, 2021-Ohio-87.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Lamb, 2021-Ohio-87. “{¶ 56} In appellant’s fifth assignment of error, appellant asserts that the application of the R.C. 2943.01 violent offender registry (VOD) to appellant following his conviction was unconstitutional.”
State v. Misch, 2021-Ohio-756, 169 N.E.3d 46. “Analysis {¶ 14} Appellant asserts in his first assignment of error that application of the R.C. 2943.01 violent offender registry (VOD) to appellant, based upon his more than 26-year- old conviction, was in violation of the Ohio Constitution’s prohibition against retroactivity.”
State v. O'Garro, 2023-Ohio-634, 209 N.E.3d 852. “] Denying a motion based on O.R.C. 2943.01(D) for being untimely is in violation of the plain language of the statute.”
State v. Harris, 2013-Ohio-2056. “11(C)(2)(a), AND R.C. 2943.01 BY Licking County, Case No. 12 CA 82 4 FAILING TO PERSONALLY ADDRESS APPELLANT AND ENSURE THAT HE UNDERSTOOD THE MAXIMUM PENALTY THAT HE FACED BY ENTERING A GUILTY PLEA.”
State v. Flores-Mata, 2024-Ohio-2987. · cites it 2× “As explained above, Francis provides that the exclusive remedy for a violation of R.C.2943.01(A) is a motion to withdraw pursuant to R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2943.01(A): 1 case
State v. Flores-Mata, 2024-Ohio-2987. “As explained above, Francis provides that the exclusive remedy for a violation of R.C.2943.01(A) is a motion to withdraw pursuant to R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2943.01(D): 2 cases
State v. O'Garro, 2023-Ohio-634, 209 N.E.3d 852. “] Denying a motion based on O.R.C. 2943.01(D) for being untimely is in violation of the plain language of the statute.”
State v. Flores-Mata, 2024-Ohio-2987. “As explained above, Francis provides that the exclusive remedy for a violation of R.C.2943.01(A) is a motion to withdraw pursuant to R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.