When it is proper for the jurors to have a view of the place at which a material fact occurred, the trial court may order them to be conducted in a body, under the charge of the sheriff or other officer, to such place, which shall be shown to them by a person designated by the court. While the jurors are absent on such view no person other than such officer and such person so appointed, shall speak to them on any subject connected with the trial. The accused has the right to attend such view by the jury, but may waive this right.
The expense of such view as approved by the court shall be taxed as other costs in the case.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1963–2026 · leading case: State v. Drummond, 111 Ohio St. 3d 14 (Ohio 2006).
State v. Drummond, 111 Ohio St. 3d 14 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 3ד{¶ 62} R.C. 2945.16 provides, “When it is proper for the jurors to have a view of the place at which a material fact occurred, the trial court may order them to be conducted in a body, under the charge of the sheriff or other officer, to such place, which shall be shown to them…”
State v. Cassano, 96 Ohio St. 3d 94 (Ohio 2002). · cites it 2דThe statute, R.C. 2945.16, specifies that “[t]he accused has the right to attend such view by the jury * * * .”
State v. Cassano, 2002 Ohio 3751 (Ohio 2002). · cites it 2דThe statute, R.C. 2945.16, specifies that “[t]he accused has the right to attend such view by the jury * * *.”
State v. Spaulding (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8126 (Ohio 2016). “” Under 26 January Term, 2016 Ohio law, defendants have a waivable right to attend a jury view, R.C. 2945.16, but we have not recognized any concomitant constitutional guarantee.”
State v. Lundgren, 653 N.E.2d 304 (Ohio 1995). · cites it 2ד” A rebuttal witness confirmed that Lundgren had planned an armed attack on the temple.”
State v. Hughkeith, 2023 Ohio 1217 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2ד” R.C. 2945.16 authorizes a trial court to allow the jury to view the place at which a material fact occurred.”
State v. Were, 118 Ohio St. 3d 448 (Ohio 2008). “” {¶ 95} R.C. 2945.16 provides: “When it is proper for the jurors to have a view of the place at which a material fact occurred, the trial court may order them to be conducted in a body * * * to such place, which shall be shown to them by a person designated by the court.”
State v. Hanna, 95 Ohio St. 3d 285 (Ohio 2002). “Appellant claims a jury view was necessary to show the jurors “the size and shape of the cell, the lighting conditions in the cell, and the positioning of Peter Copas at the time of the assault” so that the jury could see “how difficult it would be for James Hanna to…”
State v. Hanna, 2002 Ohio 2221 (Ohio 2002). “Appellant claims a jury view was necessary to show the jurors “the size and shape of the cell, the lighting conditions in the cell, and the positioning of Peter Copas at the time of the assault” 8 January Term, 2002 so that the jury could see “how difficult it would be for James…”
State v. Hopfer, 679 N.E.2d 321 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “The relevant statute pertaining to a jury view reads as follows: “When it is proper for the jurors to have a view of the place at which a material fact occurred, the trial court may order them to be conducted in a body, under the charge of the sheriff or other officer, to such…”
State v. Richey, 595 N.E.2d 915 (Ohio 1992). “However, the trial court asked counsel before the visit, “Do you have any problem waiving the presence of the court reporter?” The prosecutor said he *367 did not, and defense counsel said nothing.”
State v. Pigott, 197 N.E.2d 911 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964). · cites it 8דThe view by the jury of the premises of like and similar acts of the defendant was in violation of Section 2945.16, Revised Code. *339 “2. The view by the jury of the premises of like and similar acts of the defendant was intended to unduly inflame the minds of the jury and was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.