Notes of Decisions
State ex rel. Fowler v. Smith, 626 N.E.2d 950 (Ohio 1994).
· cites it 3× “R.C. 3111.08(A); Baldwin’s Ohio Domestic Relations Law (1992) 55, Section T 3.”
Sheppard v. Mack, 427 N.E.2d 522 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1980).
· cites it 4× ““If O.R.C. §3111.08 allows an indigent paternity defendant to remain at liberty without posting bond, the trial court referee erred by not determining whether appellant was indigent or refused or neglected to post bond.”
In re Adoption of Sunderhaus, 585 N.E.2d 418 (Ohio 1992).
· cites it 4× “Parentage may be established through a judicial admission or default pursuant to R.C. 3111.08(B), or as the result of a contested action pursuant to R.”
Austin v. Payne, 669 N.E.2d 543 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1995).
· cites it 5× “( On February 6, 1985, based on Payne’s failure to attend the pretrial, Human Services moved the trial court for a default judgment pursuant to R.C. 3111.08. The trial court scheduled a hearing on the motion and Payne was served notice of the hearing by ordinary mail.”
Lewis v. Chapin, 639 N.E.2d 848 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1994).
· cites it 4× “* * *” *706 We therefore hold that R.C. 3111.08 and R.C. 3111.13 allow a juvenile court to enter judgment in a paternity action upon satisfactory evidence of paternity.”
In re A.B., 2019-Ohio-90, 128 N.E.3d 694.
· cites it 2× “Further, although R.C. 3111.08 permits the grant of default judgment in civil actions to establish a father and child relationship, this was an action for custody, not to establish the father and child relationship, and we are aware of no such counterpart permitting default…”
In re Adoption of Lassiter, 655 N.E.2d 781 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1995).
· cites it 3× “The court also noted that “[plarentage may be established through a judicial admission or default pursuant to R.C. 3111.08(B), or as the result of a contested action pursuant to R.”
Rees v. Heimberger, 573 N.E.2d 189 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1989).
· cites it 3× “Appellant states that R.C. 3111.08 is unconstitutional and that R.”
Nelson v. Pleasant, 597 N.E.2d 1137 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1991).
“Initially, we note that although the action below took place in front of a juvenile division of the common pleas court, the Civil Rules of Procedure apply rather than the Juvenile Rules.”
McClure v. McClure, 647 N.E.2d 832 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1994).
· cites it 2× “” The procedure to obtain an order for testing to determine paternity is set forth in R.C. 3111.08. This section provides in pertinent part as follows: “(B) If an action is brought against a person to declare the existence or nonexistence of the father and child relationship…”
Seegert v. Zietlow, 642 N.E.2d 697 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1994).
“Therefore, we conclude the juvenile court has jurisdiction in a parentage action to award retroactive or back child support for the period of time prior to the date upon which the parent-child relationship is judicially established.”
Jackson v. Jackson, 739 N.E.2d 1203 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2000).
“See R.C. 3111.08 (actions brought to establish existence of father and child relationship are civil actions and are governed by the Rules of Civil Procedure); and Domigan v.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 3111.08(A): 14 cases
Nelson v. Pleasant, 597 N.E.2d 1137 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1991).
“Initially, we note that although the action below took place in front of a juvenile division of the common pleas court, the Civil Rules of Procedure apply rather than the Juvenile Rules.”
Lewis v. Chapin, 639 N.E.2d 848 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1994).
“* * *” *706 We therefore hold that R.C. 3111.08 and R.C. 3111.13 allow a juvenile court to enter judgment in a paternity action upon satisfactory evidence of paternity.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 3111.08(B): 12 cases
In re Adoption of Sunderhaus, 585 N.E.2d 418 (Ohio 1992).
“Parentage may be established through a judicial admission or default pursuant to R.C. 3111.08(B), or as the result of a contested action pursuant to R.”
In re Adoption of Lassiter, 655 N.E.2d 781 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1995).
“The court also noted that “[plarentage may be established through a judicial admission or default pursuant to R.C. 3111.08(B), or as the result of a contested action pursuant to R.”
Lewis v. Chapin, 639 N.E.2d 848 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1994).
“* * *” *706 We therefore hold that R.C. 3111.08 and R.C. 3111.13 allow a juvenile court to enter judgment in a paternity action upon satisfactory evidence of paternity.”
Seegert v. Zietlow, 642 N.E.2d 697 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1994).
“Therefore, we conclude the juvenile court has jurisdiction in a parentage action to award retroactive or back child support for the period of time prior to the date upon which the parent-child relationship is judicially established.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.