Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.023 (2026)

Review of basic child support schedule

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) At least once every four years, the department of job and family services shall review the basic child support schedule issued by the department pursuant to section 3119.021 of the Revised Code to determine whether child support orders issued in accordance with that schedule and the worksheets created under rules adopted under section 3119.022 of the Revised Code adequately provide for the needs of children who are subject to the child support orders. The review is in addition to, and independent of, any schedule update completed as set forth in section 3119.021 of the Revised Code. The department shall prepare a report of its review and include recommendations for statutory changes, and submit a copy of the report to both houses of the general assembly.

(B) Each review shall include all of the following:

(1) Consideration of all of the following:

(a) Economic data on the cost of raising children;

(b) Labor market data, such as unemployment rates, employment rates, hours worked, and earnings, by occupation and skill level for the state and local job markets;

(c) The impact of guidelines policies and amounts on custodial and noncustodial parents who have family incomes below two hundred per cent of the federal poverty level;

(d) Factors that influence employment rates among noncustodial parents and compliance with child support orders.

(2) Analysis of all of the following, to be used to ensure that deviations from the basic child support schedule are limited and that support amounts are appropriate based on criteria established under division (G) of section 3119.05 of the Revised Code:

(a) Case data on the application of and deviations from the basic child support schedule, as gathered through sampling or other methods;

(b) Rates of default, child support orders with imputed income, and orders determined using low-income adjustments such as a self-support reserve or another method as determined by the state;

(c) A comparison of payments on child support orders by case characteristics, including whether the order was entered by default, based on imputed income, or determined using the low-income adjustment, as described in division (B)(2)(b) of this section.

(3) Meaningful opportunity for public input, including input from low-income custodial and noncustodial parents and their representatives.

(C) For each review, the department shall establish a child support guideline advisory council to assist the department in the completion of its reviews and reports. Each council shall be composed of:

(1) Obligors;

(2) Obligees;

(3) Judges of courts of common pleas who have jurisdiction over domestic relations and juvenile court cases that involve the determination of child support;

(4) Attorneys whose practice includes a significant number of domestic relations or juvenile court cases that involve the determination of child support;

(5) Representatives of child support enforcement agencies;

(6) Other persons interested in the welfare of children.

(D) The department shall consider input from the council prior to the completion of any report under this section. The department shall submit its report on or before the first day of March of every fourth year after 2015.

(E) The department shall publish on the internet and make accessible to the public all of the following:

(1) All reports of the council;

(2) The membership of the council;

(3) The effective date of new or modified guidelines adopted after the review;

(4) The date of the next review.

(F) The advisory council shall cease to exist at the time that the department submits its review to the general assembly under this section.

(G) Any expenses incurred by an advisory council shall be paid by the department.

Last updated October 3, 2023 at 11:02 AM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2022 · leading case: Funkhouser v. Funkhouser, 2019 Ohio 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Funkhouser v. Funkhouser, 2019 Ohio 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “79(A) and (C), was the worksheet required by R.C. 3119.023 for split parental rights and responsibilities.”
Morrow v. Becker, 2013 Ohio 4542 (Ohio 2013). · cites it 2× “R.C. 3119.023. The starting point is parental income: either gross income (for those employed to full capacity) or gross income plus potential income (for those not employed to full capacity).”
Sweeney v. Sweeney, 2019 Ohio 1750 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “On the same day, Brian filed a proposed child-support worksheet—a split-parenting computation worksheet under former R.C. 3119.023. {¶4} At a November 1, 2017 hearing on Brian’s first motion, the parties informed the trial court that they were negotiating a shared-parenting plan…”
Collins v. Collins, 2011 Ohio 2087 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “See R.C. 3119.023; R.C. 3119.03. {¶24} R.C. 3119.”
Marron v. Marron, 2014 Ohio 2121 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “Husband was prejudiced by nothing other than his own failure to present evidence dependents covered by the plan, including the children subject of the support order, times the number of children subject of the support order.”
Sanchez v. Casiano, 2022 Ohio 4179 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “See R.C. 3119.023; R.C. 3119.03. {¶ 23} R.C. 3119.”
Carpenter v. Carpenter, 2010 Ohio 6601 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “R.C. 3119.023. The final divorce decree required Darwin to maintain secondary health insurance coverage for the children.”
Evangelista v. Horton, 2011 Ohio 1472 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “022, which is the statutory child support worksheet, authorizes the court to order an amount of child support that deviates from the amount determined from the child support schedule and worksheet if, upon considering the factors set forth in R.C. 3119.023, the court determines…”
Michaels v. Saunders, 2015 Ohio 3172 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “Because Line 8 of the worksheet only allows for a deduction when the child at issue is one born “to the parent and a person other than 1 We note that Father has not argued that he and Mother have split parental rights such that the court erred by not using the worksheet…”
Morrow v. Becker, 2018 Ohio 3316 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “R.C. 3119.023. The starting point is parental income: either gross income (for those employed to full capacity) or gross income plus potential income (for those not employed to full capacity).”
MacDonald v. MacDonald, 2011 Ohio 5389 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “Worksheet {¶ 25} John’s first argument is that the trial court incorrectly used the split-parenting worksheet under R.C. 3119.023 instead of the shared-parenting worksheet under R.”
Sandorf v. Sandorf, 190 Ohio App. 3d 355 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “022 instead of the split-parenting worksheet under R.C. 3119.023 to calculate the appropriate amount of support.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.