A court with jurisdiction over a court support order may modify an obligor's duty to pay a support payment that becomes due after notice of a petition to modify the court support order has been given to each obligee and to the obligor before a final order concerning the petition for modification is entered.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: In re J.S., 2012-Ohio-421.
In re J.S., 2012-Ohio-421. · cites it 7ד” R.C. 3119.84 provides: “A court with jurisdiction over a court support order may modify an obligor’s duty to pay a support payment that becomes due after notice of a petition to modify the court support order has been given to each obligee and to the obligor before a final…”
Byrd v. Knuckles, 900 N.E.2d 164 (Ohio 2008). · cites it 3ד{¶ 4} R.C. 3119.84, the exception to R.C. 3119.”
Walker v. Walker, 784 N.E.2d 127 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2003). · cites it 4ד” {¶ 19} R.C. 3119.84 states: {¶ 20} “A court with jurisdiction over a court support order may modify an obligor’s duty to pay a support payment that becomes due after notice of a petition to modify the court support order has been given to each obligee and to the obligor before…”
Behnken v. Behnken, 2020-Ohio-389. · cites it 4ד83 and R.C. 3119.84. Entry Overruling Objections (May 30, 2019), p.”
Phelps v. Saffian, 2016-Ohio-5514. “The magistrate ordered support modification retroactive to the date when Phelps filed her motion to modify child support.”
Ward v. Ward, 2016-Ohio-5178. “Appellee's October 8, 2013 motion to modify child support was predicated on a change of circumstances.”
In re S.C., 2020-Ohio-233, 151 N.E.3d 953. “CA2008-02- 014, 2008-Ohio-5668, ¶ 21 ; R.C. 3119.84. Ohio courts have held that an exception to that rule is that a trial court may modify the support obligation to a time before the motion was filed if the court finds that the support obligor perpetuated fraud.”
In re K.A.V., 2014-Ohio-5575. “In the same vein, R.C. 3119.84 provides that “[a] court with jurisdiction over a court support order may modify an obligor’s duty to pay a support payment that becomes due after notice of a petition to modify the court support order has been 3 The general rule is that a…”
Cauthen v. Cauthen, 2017-Ohio-5846. “Further, she argues that R.C. 3119.84 says that a court may modify a child support arrearage only to the extent that the arrearage accrues after a petition to modify the order has been given to each obligee and to the obligor before a final order concerning the petition…”
Crandall v. Crandall, 2020-Ohio-625. “5 {¶22} R.C. 3119.84 allows the court to “modify an obligor’s duty to pay a support payment that becomes due after notice of a petition to modify the court support order has been given to each obligee and to the obligor before a final order concerning the petition for…”
Winn v. Wilson, 2018-Ohio-1010. “{¶ 39} R.C. 3119.84 provides that a court "may modify an obligor's duty to pay a support payment that becomes due after notice of a petition to modify the court support order has been given to each obligee and to the obligor before a final order concerning the petition -9-…”
Fenicle v. Heinze, 2024-Ohio-2941, 249 N.E.3d 360. · cites it 5דR.C. 3119.84. IV. The trial court erred when it made Mother the child support obligor under a shared parenting plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.