Whenever a loss or damage occurs on account of a casualty covered by a contract of insurance made between an insurance company and any person, firm, or corporation, by which contract such person, firm, or corporation is insured against loss or damage on account of the bodily injury or death by accident of any person for which loss or damage such person, firm, or corporation is responsible, the liability of the insurance company is absolute, and the payment of said loss does not depend upon the satisfaction by the assured of a final judgment against him for loss, damage, or death occasioned by such casualty.
No such contract of insurance shall be canceled or annulled by any agreement between the insurance company and the assured after said assured has become responsible for such loss, damage, or death, and any such cancellation or annullment is void.
McCruter v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co., 2021-Ohio-472, 168 N.E.3d 1. · cites it 8ד13 {¶49} R.C. 3929.05 and 3929.06 address liability insurance for bodily injury or death.”
Collins v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2017-Ohio-880, 80 N.E.3d 542. · cites it 2דMoreover, appellee's assertion that appellant retroactively voided the policy pursuant to R.C. 3929.05 is without merit. R.C. 3929.”
Stickovich v. City of Cleveland, 757 N.E.2d 50 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 2001). “9510-3 and 9510-4, which are now codified at R.C. 3929.05 and 3929.06, respectively. The effect of these provisions was to mandate that insurance agreements covering injury to persons be in the form of liability rather than indemnity policies.”
Meinberg v. Glaser, 237 N.E.2d 605 (Ohio 1968). · cites it 3דSections 3929.05 and 3929.06, Revised Code, indicate that there may be recovery on a judgment against an administrator or executor on such insurance.”
Baggott v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 101 F. Supp. 2d 556 (S.D. Ohio 1999). · cites it 3דSince Duriron was an insured under Kuhns’ liability insurance policy, Judge Weinman, relying upon Ohio Revised Code § 3929.05, 20 held that Kuhns’ insurance carrier was obligated to pay the judgment, regardless of whether Duriron had a right of indemnification against Kuhns.”
Kutza v. Parker, 185 N.E.2d 53 (Ohio Ct. App. 1962). · cites it 4דThere is no doubt that the appellant at the time of the accident carried liability insurance; and into this insurance contract must be read Section 3929.05, Revised Code, which provides (in part) that: “Whenever a loss or damage occurs on account of a casualty covered by a…”
Stephenson v. Duriron Co., 292 F. Supp. 66 (S.D. Ohio 1968). · cites it 2דSection 3929.05 Ohio Revised Code provides: “Whenever a loss or damage occurs on account of a casualty covered by a contract of insurance made between an insurance company and any person, firm, or corporation, by which contract such person, firm or corporation is insured against…”
Ward v. Custom Glass & Frame, Inc., 663 N.E.2d 734 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1995). “Appellee filed a supplementary complaint against appellants seeking recovery for the amount of the judgment pursuant to R.C. 3929.05. Cross-motions for summary judgment were filed with appellants claiming that the policy did not cover intentional torts and that Custom also…”
Alms & Doepke Co. v. Johnson, 128 N.E.2d 250 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1954). “The final question is whether Sections 9510-3 and 9510-4, General Code (Sections 3929.05 and 3929.06, Revised Code), have so altered the relations between indemnity companies and the insured as to enable the injured person after securing a judgment against the insured to require…”
Marks v. Allstate Ins., 794 N.E.2d 129 (Ohio Ct. App. 5th Dist. 2003). “The court rejected this argument and stated: *386 {¶ 34} “[PJayment of a claim for property damage is not tantamount to obtaining a judgment against the insured which would permit the injured person to sue the insurer under R.”
Kincaid v. Smith, 167 F. Supp. 195 (N.D. Ohio 1958). “This action is brought under favor of §§3929.05 and 3929.08 R. C. (former §§9510-3, 9510-4 GC.”
Judd v. Queen City Metro, 508 N.E.2d 1034 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1986). “Further, the practical effect of R.C. 3929.05 and 3929.06, which state the insurer’s liability is absolute whenever the covered loss occurs without the necessity for a satisfaction of the judgment, is to make all policies against liability to third parties for personal injury or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.