Okla. Stat. » Title 10 — CHILDREN
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1129 (2026)

Renumbered as § 7001-1.2 of this title by Laws 1995, c

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

352, § 199, eff. July 1, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1976–2004 · leading case: Davis v. Davis, 708 P.2d 1102 (Okla. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Davis v. Davis, 708 P.2d 1102 (Okla. 1985). “10 O.S.1981 § 1129; Ex parte Parnell, 19 Okl.”
Edwards v. State, 591 P.2d 313 (Okla. Crim. App. 1979). “It is provided by 10 O.S.1971, § 1129: “This Act shall be liberally construed, to the end that its purpose may be carried out, to wit: That the care and custody and discipline of the child shall approximate, as nearly as may be, that which should be given by its parents, and…”
Ives v. Boone, 101 F. App'x 274 (10th Cir. 2004). “” Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1129 (1987). 7 Indeed, at the time of the deprived child hearing, Oklahoma law specifically provided that “cases of children shall be heard separately from the trial of cases against adults.”
State v. Juv. Div., 560 P.2d 974 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). “See 10 O.S.1971, § 1129, and Taskforce Report: Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime, President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967).”
D. M. T. v. Edmiston, 560 P.2d 976 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). “See 10 O.S.1971, § 1129. For these reasons, violations of mere traffic laws and ordinances are excluded from the jurisdiction to the extent that a single violation is not a delinquent act but habitual violations will support an adjudication of delinquency.”
Mason v. State, 868 P.2d 724 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “" 10 O.S.Supp. 1982, § 1129(1). See also D.”
Oklahoma Publ'g Co. v. Dist. Court of Oklahoma Cnty., 555 P.2d 1286 (Okla. 1976). “10 O.S.1971 § 1129 provides: This Act shall be liberally construed, to the end that its purpose may be carried out, to wit: That the care and custody and discipline of the child shall approximate, as nearly as may be, that which should be given by its parents, and that, as far…”
Matter of Sanders, 564 P.2d 273 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). “The defendants argue that 10 O.S.1971, § 1129, which provides that the act should be liberally construed to the end that its purpose may be carried out, to wit: “That the care and custody and discipline of the child shall approximate, as nearly as may be, that which should be…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1129(1): 1 case
Mason v. State, 868 P.2d 724 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). “" 10 O.S.Supp. 1982, § 1129(1). See also D.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.