Okla. Stat. » Title 10 — CHILDREN
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1605 (2026)

Renumbered as § 505 of Title 43 by Laws 1990, c. 188, §

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1, eff. Sept. 1, 1990.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1981–1994 · leading case: Roundtree v. Bates, 630 P.2d 1299 (Okla. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roundtree v. Bates, 630 P.2d 1299 (Okla. 1981). · cites it 5× “10 O.S.Supp.1980 § 1605(A)(2)(a), (b), (C).”
G.S. v. Ewing, 786 P.2d 65 (Okla. 1990). · cites it 2× “10 O.S.1981 § 1605 states: Prerequisites for jurisdiction A.”
Application of Guthrie, 792 P.2d 1197 (Okla. Civ. App. 1990). · cites it 5× “1981 § 1604(3), (5), (9) and 10 O.S.Supp. 1989 § 1605. [1] The Oregon guardianship was a "dependency" proceeding and, thus, under section 1604(3), a "custody proceeding.”
Draper v. Roberts, 839 P.2d 165 (Okla. 1992). · cites it 2× “The district court found that Oklahoma is the home state of the minor child, pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 10 O.S.Supp.1982 § 1605. The evidence does not support this conclusion inasmuch as the child had resided in Texas for the six months prior to the…”
Miles v. Young, 818 P.2d 1258 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “Both Young and Miles appeal from the trial court’s judgment. Young first alleges the trial court erred in finding it had jurisdiction under the UCCJA.”
Matter of CAD, 839 P.2d 165 (Okla. 1992). · cites it 2× “[5] The district court found that Oklahoma is the home state of the minor child, pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 10 O.S.Supp. 1982 § 1605. The evidence does not support this conclusion inasmuch as the child had resided in Texas for the six months prior to…”
Wade v. Geren, 743 P.2d 1070 (Okla. 1987). “They cite us to 10 O.S.1981 § 1605, the Oklahoma counterpart of that act, which provides: A.”
Magers v. Magers, 645 P.2d 1039 (Okla. Civ. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “, § 1603 states: The provisions of this act shall apply to all custody proceedings brought within this state, whether as an initial proceeding or modification, and regardless of the absence of jurisdictional dispute.”
People ex rel. K.G., 876 P.2d 1 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). “43, § 505 (1990) (then Okla.Stat. tit. 10, § 1605 (1980)). The father responded that the court had jurisdiction because of significant connections between the children and the state.”
Boucher v. Boucher, 771 P.2d 242 (Okla. Civ. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Appellant then apparently returned to Oklahoma, and filed her Special Appearance, Objection to Jurisdiction and Motion to Quash, asserting that the Oklahoma Courts had no jurisdicition under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 10 O.S.1981 § 1605 (UCCJA). On April 23,…”
Breaux v. Mays, 746 P.2d 708 (Okla. Civ. App. 1987). “) Title 10 O.S.1981, § 1605 (A) provides in part: A court of this State which is competent to decide child custody matters has jurisdiction to make a child custody determination by initial or modification decree if: 1.”
State ex rel. Murphy v. Boudreau, 653 P.2d 542 (Okla. 1982). “10 O.S.1981, § 1605(A)(l-4). The primary problems the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act attempts to address are child-snatching and multi-state jurisdictional squabbles.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1605(A) — 5 cases
Draper v. Roberts, 839 P.2d 165 (Okla. 1992). “The district court found that Oklahoma is the home state of the minor child, pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 10 O.S.Supp.1982 § 1605. The evidence does not support this conclusion inasmuch as the child had resided in Texas for the six months prior to the…”
Roundtree v. Bates, 630 P.2d 1299 (Okla. 1981). “10 O.S.Supp.1980 § 1605(A)(2)(a), (b), (C).”
Matter of CAD, 839 P.2d 165 (Okla. 1992). “[5] The district court found that Oklahoma is the home state of the minor child, pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 10 O.S.Supp. 1982 § 1605. The evidence does not support this conclusion inasmuch as the child had resided in Texas for the six months prior to…”
Boucher v. Boucher, 771 P.2d 242 (Okla. Civ. App. 1989). “Appellant then apparently returned to Oklahoma, and filed her Special Appearance, Objection to Jurisdiction and Motion to Quash, asserting that the Oklahoma Courts had no jurisdicition under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 10 O.S.1981 § 1605 (UCCJA). On April 23,…”
State ex rel. Murphy v. Boudreau, 653 P.2d 542 (Okla. 1982). “10 O.S.1981, § 1605(A)(l-4). The primary problems the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act attempts to address are child-snatching and multi-state jurisdictional squabbles.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1605(A)(1)(a) — 1 case
Roundtree v. Bates, 630 P.2d 1299 (Okla. 1981). “10 O.S.Supp.1980 § 1605(A)(2)(a), (b), (C).”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1605(A)(2) — 1 case
G.S. v. Ewing, 786 P.2d 65 (Okla. 1990). “10 O.S.1981 § 1605 states: Prerequisites for jurisdiction A.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1605(A)(2)(a) — 1 case
Roundtree v. Bates, 630 P.2d 1299 (Okla. 1981). “10 O.S.Supp.1980 § 1605(A)(2)(a), (b), (C).”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1605(A)(3)(b) — 1 case
Magers v. Magers, 645 P.2d 1039 (Okla. Civ. App. 1982). “, § 1603 states: The provisions of this act shall apply to all custody proceedings brought within this state, whether as an initial proceeding or modification, and regardless of the absence of jurisdictional dispute.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1605(A)(4)(a) — 1 case
Roundtree v. Bates, 630 P.2d 1299 (Okla. 1981). “10 O.S.Supp.1980 § 1605(A)(2)(a), (b), (C).”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1605(D) — 1 case
Roundtree v. Bates, 630 P.2d 1299 (Okla. 1981). “10 O.S.Supp.1980 § 1605(A)(2)(a), (b), (C).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.