Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 44-110 (2026)

Appeals from the board of adjustment

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. An appeal from any action, decision, ruling, judgment or order of the board of adjustment may be taken by any person or persons who were entitled, pursuant to Section 44-108 of this title, to mailed notice of the public hearing before the board of adjustment, by any person or persons whose property interests are directly affected by such action, decision, ruling, judgment or order of the board of adjustment, or by the governing body of the municipality to the district court in the county in which the situs of the municipality is located. B. The appeal shall be taken by filing with the municipal clerk and with the clerk of the board of adjustment, within the time limits which may be fixed by ordinance, a notice of appeal. The notice shall specify the grounds for the appeal. No bond or deposit for costs shall be required for such appeal. C. Upon filing the notice of appeal, the board of adjustment shall forthwith transmit to the court clerk the original, or certified copies, of all papers constituting the record in the case, together with the order, decision or ruling of the board. D. The appeal shall be heard and tried de novo in the district court. All issues in any proceedings under this section shall have preference over all other civil actions and proceedings. E. During the pendency of such an appeal, the effectiveness of a decision of the board of adjustment shall not be suspended unless a party applies to the district court for a stay pending the district court's determination of the merits of the appeal. Notice of such application shall be given by first class mail to all parties, to the district court appeal and to any applicant before the board of adjustment. Upon filing of an application for stay in the district court, all proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from shall be temporarily stayed pending the outcome of a hearing regarding the stay, which shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of application. The Court shall determine whether to impose a stay by considering the following factors: (i) the likelihood of success on the merits by the party seeking to impose the stay, (ii) irreparable harm to the property interests of the party seeking to impose the stay if the stay is not imposed, (iii) relative effect on the other interested parties, and (iv) public policy concerns arising out of the imposition of the stay. If the court determines to impose a stay, the court shall require a bond or other security and such other terms as it deems proper to secure the rights of the parties and compensate for costs of delay. A bond or other security shall be posted within ten (10) business days of the court's determination; provided, that a municipal governing body shall not be required to post a bond. Subject to subsection A of Section 990.3 of Title 12 of the Oklahoma Statutes, a stay pursuant to this subsection shall automatically dissolve after a judgment,

decree or final order resolving the merits of the appeal is filed with the court clerk. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, stays in appeals from the board of adjustment to the district court shall be obtained only as set forth in this section. F. The district court may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or modify the decision brought up for review. Costs shall not be allowed against the board of adjustment unless it shall appear to the district court that the board acted with gross negligence or in bad faith or with malice in making the decision appealed from. An appeal shall lie from the action of the district court as in all other civil actions. A party may obtain a stay of the enforcement of the district court's judgment, decree or final order as provided by Section 990.4 of Title 12 of the Oklahoma Statutes. Added by Laws 1977, c. 256, § 44-110, eff. July 1, 1978. Amended by Laws 2016, c. 11, § 1, emerg. eff. April 5, 2016.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2021 · leading case: Osage Nation v. Bd. of Commissioners of Osage Cnty. & Osage Nation v. Osage Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2017 OK 34 (Okla. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Osage Nation v. Bd. of Commissioners of Osage Cnty. & Osage Nation v. Osage Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2017 OK 34 (Okla. 2017). “3d 1088, 1092 (the statutory requirements for perfecting an appeal from a decision of a municipal board of adjustment to the district court, set forth in 11 O.S.2001 § 44-110, are mandatory). 8 Mustang Run Wind , 2016 OK 113, ¶ 30 , 387 P.”

Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Bd. of Adjustment, 2002 OK 80 (Okla. 2002). · cites it 2× “" [10] Title 11 O.S.2001 § 44-110(D) provides in pertinent part: "A.”

Nova Health Sys. v. Edmondson, 460 F.3d 1295 (10th Cir. 2006). “”) (footnote omitted); Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 44-110 (D) (appeals from zoning board decisions "shall have preference over all other civil actions and proceedings”); Okla Stat.”

Kay v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 504 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2007). “07 (30 days); Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 44-110 (time to appeal to be determined by local ordinance); Or.”

Harvey v. Auto Plus of Woodward, 287 P.3d 410 (Okla. Civ. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “11 O.S. § 44-110(D). Taxing costs is discretionary.”

Vinson v. Medley, 737 P.2d 932 (Okla. 1987). “The terms of 11 O.S.1981 § 44-110(D) provide: "The appeal shall be heard and tried de novo in the district court.”

Hargrave v. Tulsa Bd. of Adjustment, 55 P.3d 1088 (Okla. 2002). “Although we do not decide whether estoppel may ever *1093 be applied to toll the statutory time limitation for perfecting an appeal from a board of adjustment, the board's conduct in this case does not rise to the level of equitable estop-pel.”

Osage Nation v. Bd. of Commissioners of Osage Cnty. & Osage Nation v. Osage Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2017 OK 34 (Okla. 2017). · cites it 2× “3d 1088, 1092 (the statutory requirements for perfecting an appeal from a decision of a municipal board of adjustment to the district court, set forth in 11 O.S.2001 § 44-110, are mandatory). 8 Mustang Run Wind , 2016 OK 113, ¶ 30, 387 P.”

Mccleary v. City of Broken Arrow Bd. of Adjustment, 2022 OK CIV APP 2 (Okla. Civ. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to 11 O.S.Supp. 2016 §44-110 de novo on February 14, 2020.”

Kay v. Rancho Palos Verdes (9th Cir. 2007). “07 (30 days); Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 44-110 (time to appeal to be determined by local ordinance); Or.”

Liberty Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City, N.A. v. Perimeter Ctr. Ltd. P'ship, 958 P.2d 814 (Okla. Civ. App. 1998). “Further, this matter has resulted in a trial court conclusion affecting the right of the City to enforce an action of the Board of Adjustment opposite the court’s decision, and outside the appellate process established by statute.”

— Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 44-110(D) — 3 cases

Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Bd. of Adjustment, 2002 OK 80 (Okla. 2002). “" [10] Title 11 O.S.2001 § 44-110(D) provides in pertinent part: "A.”

Harvey v. Auto Plus of Woodward, 287 P.3d 410 (Okla. Civ. App. 2012). “11 O.S. § 44-110(D). Taxing costs is discretionary.”

Vinson v. Medley, 737 P.2d 932 (Okla. 1987). “The terms of 11 O.S.1981 § 44-110(D) provide: "The appeal shall be heard and tried de novo in the district court.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.