Okla. Stat. » Title 12 — CIVIL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1851 (2026)

Short title

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 1 through 31 of this act shall be known and may be cited as the “Uniform Arbitration Act”. Added by Laws 2005, c. 364, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case: Signature Leasing LLC v. Buyer's Grp. LLC, 2020 OK 50, 466 P.3d 544.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Signature Leasing LLC v. Buyer's Grp. LLC, 2020 OK 50, 466 P.3d 544. · cites it 2× “12 O.S.2011, §§ 1851, 1854. Section 1880(A) of the OUAA mandates that "[i]n applying and construing the Uniform Arbitration Act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.”
Sutton v. David Stanley Chevrolet, 2020 OK 87, 475 P.3d 847. “In Oklahoma state courts, the Oklahoma version of the Uniform Arbitration Act, 12 O.S. 2011, §1851 et seq., determines how proceedings on an application to compel arbitration shall be conducted so long as the Act does not frustrate the purposes underlying the FAA.”
Howell's Well Serv. v. Focus Grp. Advisors, 2021 OK 25, 507 P.3d 623. “Arbitration agreements are statutorily allowed by Oklahoma's amended version of the Uniform Arbitration Act (OUAA), 12 O.S.2011, §§ 1851- 1881. Parties' agreements to bind themselves to mandatory arbitration are generally looked upon with favor as a shortcut to substantial…”
Bruner v. Timberlane Manor Ltd. P'ship, 2006 OK 90, 155 P.3d 16. “, was recodified at 12 O.S.Supp.2005, §§ 1851, et seq., effective January 1, 2006.”
Lucky Duck Drilling, LLC v. Am. Oil for Americans, LP, 443 P.3d 1144 (Okla. Civ. App. 2019). “See 12 O.S.2011, §§ 1851 - 1881, originally effective on October 1, 1978, at 15 O.”
Asset Acceptance, LLC v. Johnson, 2011 OK CIV APP 121, 268 P.3d 551. “It is unclear whether the Arbitrator followed the procedural dictates of the Oklahoma Uniform Arbitration Act, 12 O.S. § 1851, et seq., as he cited only the Federal Arbitration Act as noted herein at paragraph 6.”
Beverly Thompson v. Heartway Corp., 2025 OK 65, 579 P.3d 622. · cites it 2× “3d 826 12 O.S.2021, §§ 1851 Id ., ¶ 15, 138 P.3d at 830, citing Volt v.”
Boles v. Carshield, LLC, No. 4:22-cv-00034 (N.D. Okla. Dec. 21, 2023). “Governing Law The VSC does not specify whether the Oklahoma Uniform Arbitration Act (“OUAA”), Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1851 , et seq., or the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.”
Wohlford v. Am. Auto Shield LLC, No. 5:22-cv-00520, 2023 WL 1107891 (W.D. Okla. Jan. 30, 2023). “Governing Law Defendants acknowledge that the VSC does not specify whether the Oklahoma Uniform Arbitration Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1851 , et seq. (OUAA) or the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.”
Exencial Wealth Advisors v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, 2024 OK CIV APP 29. “STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 Neither party addresses whether the agreement to arbitrate at issue in this case is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.