Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024 (2026)

Intervention

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

INTERVENTION A. INTERVENTION OF RIGHT. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action: 1. When a statute confers an unconditional right to intervene; or 2. When the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and the applicant is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the applicant's ability to protect that interest; provided, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that disposition of a petition requesting the appointment of a guardian for an incapacitated or partially incapacitated person will impair or impede the ability to protect property or other rights of the persons required to receive notice of the appointment pursuant to Section 3-110 of Title 30 of the Oklahoma Statutes. B. PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION. Upon timely application anyone may be permitted to intervene in an action: 1. When a statute confers a conditional right to intervene; or 2. When an applicant's claim or defense and the main action have a question of law or fact in common. When a party to an action relies for ground of claim or defense upon any statute or executive order administered by a federal or state governmental officer or agency or upon any regulation, order, requirement or agreement issued or made pursuant to the statute or executive order, the officer or agency upon timely application may be permitted to intervene in the action. In exercising its discretion the court shall consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties. C. PROCEDURE. A person desiring to intervene shall serve a motion to intervene upon the parties as provided in Section 2005 of this title. The motion shall state the grounds therefor and shall be accompanied by a pleading setting forth the claim or defense for which intervention is sought. If the motion to intervene is granted, the plaintiff or defendant, or both, may respond to the pleading of the intervenor within twenty (20) days after the date that the motion was granted unless the court prescribes a shorter time. D. INTERVENTION BY STATE OF OKLAHOMA.

1. In any action, suit, or proceeding to which the State of Oklahoma or any agency, officer, or employee thereof is not a party, wherein the constitutionality of any statute of this state affecting the public interest is drawn into question, the court shall certify such fact to the Attorney General, and shall permit the State of Oklahoma to intervene for presentation of evidence, if evidence is otherwise admissible in the case, and for argument on the question of constitutionality. The State of Oklahoma shall, subject to the applicable provisions of law, have all the rights of a party and be subject to all liabilities of a party as to court costs to the extent necessary for a proper presentation of the facts and law relating to the question of constitutionality. 2. Upon receipt of notice pursuant to paragraph 1 of this subsection or other actual notice that the constitutionality of any statute of this state affecting the public interest is drawn into question, the Attorney General shall immediately deliver a copy of the proceeding to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate who may intervene on behalf of their respective house of the Legislature and who shall be entitled to be heard. Intervention by the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President Pro Tempore of the Senate shall not constitute waiver of legislative immunity. Added by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 26, eff. Nov. 1, 1984. Amended by Laws 2003, c. 142, § 1; Laws 2016, c. 320, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2016.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: Wells v. Oklahoma Roofing & Sheet Metal, 2019 OK 45, 457 P.3d 1020.
Wells v. Oklahoma Roofing & Sheet Metal, 2019 OK 45, 457 P.3d 1020. · cites it 2× “2010), pursuant to Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024 (D)(1). 2 Section 12 limits an employer's liability to the exclusive purview of the Workers' Compensation Court, except in cases of an intentional tort.”
Nicholas v. Morgan, 2002 OK 88, 58 P.3d 775. · cites it 2× “1991, § 44(a) as the legal basis of its right to intervene under 12 O.S.1991, § 2024. ¶ 6 Taylor and Morgan and their firm pressed for dismissal of the petition for intervention.”
Brown v. Patel, 2007 OK 16, 157 P.3d 117. “12 O.S.Supp.2003 § 2024(A)(2). The "is or may be bound" language in the Utah rule was amended after Lima and now corresponds to Oklahoma's version of the requirement.”
State ex rel. Choctaw Cnty. Dist. Attorney v. Anderson, 749 P.2d 542 (Okla. 1988). · cites it 2× “12 O.S.Supp. 1984 § 2024 governs intervention and provides in pertinent part: A.”
Matter of BC, 749 P.2d 542 (Okla. 1988). · cites it 2× “12 O.S.Supp. 1984 § 2024 governs intervention and provides in pertinent part: A.”
Ross v. Peters, 846 P.2d 1107 (Okla. 1993). “The terms of 12 O.S.Supp.1984 § 2024(B) authorize the court to allow parties to intervene in an action.”
Fed. Land Bank of Wichita v. Story, 756 P.2d 588 (Okla. 1988). · cites it 2× “On November 6, 1986, the State intervened as provided by 12 O.S.Supp. 1984, § 2024(D) and was given until November 17, 1986, to respond.”
Harvey v. Auto Plus of Woodward, 2012 OK CIV APP 92, 287 P.3d 410. · cites it 2× “12 O.S. § 2024. The trial court has discretion to admit evidence of specific instances of conduct probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness.”
Grand River Dam Auth. v. Brogna, 827 P.2d 901 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “He filed a motion to intervene pursuant to 12 O.S.Supp.1984 § 2024, claiming he was a necessary party to the condemnation action because it would impair his ability to protect his interest.”
Private Truck Council of Am., Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 806 P.2d 598 (Okla. 1991). “, were granted permission to intervene pursuant to 12 O.S.Supp.1984, § 2024. Since the imposition of third structure taxes upon Oklahoma base-registered operators of motor carriers constitutes a barrier to conducting interstate business in that taxing state, both intervenors,…”
In re the Adoption of G.D.L., 747 P.2d 282 (Okla. 1987). “12 O.S.Supp.1984 § 2024 governs intervention and provides in pertinent part: A.”
State ex rel. Oklahoma Corp. v. Mcpherson, 2010 OK 31, 232 P.3d 458. “¶ 14 In support of the trial court's order and in response to Taxpayers' arguments, the Commission and Defendants argue (1) that appellants fail to satisfy the requirements for intervention specified in the Pleading Code at 12 O.S. § 2024, (2) that the Indemnity Fund does not…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024(A): 4 cases
First Pryority Bank v. Moon, 2014 OK CIV APP 21, 326 P.3d 528.
First Pryority Bank v. Moon, 2014 OK CIV APP 21.
Grand River Dam Auth. v. Brogna, 827 P.2d 901 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). “He filed a motion to intervene pursuant to 12 O.S.Supp.1984 § 2024, claiming he was a necessary party to the condemnation action because it would impair his ability to protect his interest.”
Kent v. City of Oklahoma City, 2020 OK CIV APP 21.
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024(A)(2): 4 cases
Brown v. Patel, 2007 OK 16, 157 P.3d 117. “12 O.S.Supp.2003 § 2024(A)(2). The "is or may be bound" language in the Utah rule was amended after Lima and now corresponds to Oklahoma's version of the requirement.”
Superior Supply Co. v. Torres, 900 P.2d 1005 (Okla. Civ. App. 1995).
Grand River Dam Auth. v. Brogna, 827 P.2d 901 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). “He filed a motion to intervene pursuant to 12 O.S.Supp.1984 § 2024, claiming he was a necessary party to the condemnation action because it would impair his ability to protect his interest.”
Evans v. GEICO Cas. Co., No. 4:20-cv-00332 (N.D. Okla. Mar. 22, 2022).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024(B): 2 cases
Ross v. Peters, 846 P.2d 1107 (Okla. 1993). “The terms of 12 O.S.Supp.1984 § 2024(B) authorize the court to allow parties to intervene in an action.”
Good v. Farmers Ins. Co., 2023 OK CIV APP 28.
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024(B)(2): 1 case
Evans v. GEICO Cas. Co., No. 4:20-cv-00332 (N.D. Okla. Mar. 22, 2022).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024(C): 1 case
Good v. Farmers Ins. Co., 2023 OK CIV APP 28.
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024(D): 4 cases
Fed. Land Bank of Wichita v. Story, 756 P.2d 588 (Okla. 1988). “On November 6, 1986, the State intervened as provided by 12 O.S.Supp. 1984, § 2024(D) and was given until November 17, 1986, to respond.”
Pub. Svc. Co. v. Duncan Pub. Util. Autho., 2011 OK CIV APP 15, 248 P.3d 400.
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024(D)(1): 1 case
Wells v. Oklahoma Roofing & Sheet Metal, 2019 OK 45, 457 P.3d 1020. “2010), pursuant to Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2024 (D)(1). 2 Section 12 limits an employer's liability to the exclusive purview of the Workers' Compensation Court, except in cases of an intentional tort.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.