Okla. Stat. » Title 12 — CIVIL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 92 (2026)

Limitations applicable

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Civil actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this article, after the cause of action shall have accrued; but where, in special cases, a different limitation is prescribed by statute, the action shall be governed by such limitation.

R.L. 1910, § 4654.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1955–2026 · leading case: Consol. Grain & Barge Co. v. Structural Sys., Inc., 2009 OK 14, 212 P.3d 1168.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Consol. Grain & Barge Co. v. Structural Sys., Inc., 2009 OK 14, 212 P.3d 1168. · cites it 2× “12 O.S.2001, § 92 (providing that civil actions can only be commenced within the statutory time periods "after the cause of action shall have accrued").”
Sisk v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 2003 OK 69, 81 P.3d 55. · cites it 2× “For example, 12 O.S. § 92 reads: "civil actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this article.”
Horton v. Hamilton, 2015 OK 6, 345 P.3d 357. “" 12 O.S.2011, § 92. The accrual date may be identified by statute, but it can only be present when each element of the cause of action has materialized.”
Keota Mills & Elevator v. Gamble, 2010 OK 12, 243 P.3d 1156. “See 12 O.S. § 92 (1910).... [3] Title 12 O.S.”
State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Emery, 645 P.2d 1048 (Okla. Civ. App. 1982). “Appellee’s motion to dismiss was sustained on the grounds that the tax warrant was barred by the statute of limitations, 12 O.S.1971, § 92, and the dormancy statute, 12 O.”
Rucker v. Repub. Supply Co., 415 P.2d 951 (Okla. 1966). “Statute of limitations began to run against a cause of action at the time a cause of action accrued, 12 O.S.1961, § 92. A cause of action on the Guaranty accrued when the above judgment became final, Wood v.”
Cadle Co. v. Bianco, 849 P.2d 437 (Okla. Civ. App. 1992). “12 O.S.1991 § 92. An action upon an agreement in writing must be commenced within five years after it accrues.”
Horton v. Hamilton, 2015 OK 6. · cites it 6× “" 12 O.S.2011, § 92. The accrual date may be identified by statute, but it can only be present when each element of the cause of action has materialized.”
Fields, No. 6:23-cv-00372 (E.D. Okla. Mar. 23, 2026). “161 at 7 (citing 12 O.S. §§ 92, 95)]. Crown relies on plaintiffs' testimony affirming that, on September 15, 2021, they "noticed issues beyond anything a simple cosmetic trim-out could cure," [Dkt.”
Duke v. Town of Okemah ex rel. Clowers, 289 P.2d 377 (Okla. 1955). “The general statutes of limitations provide that civil actions can only be commenced within the periods provided in those sections except where, “in special cases, a different limitation is prescribed by statute, the action shall be governed by such limitation” 12 O.S.1951 § 92.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.