Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 60 (2026)

Actual fraud a question of fact

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Actual fraud is always a question of fact. R.L.1910, § 905.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2009–2023 · leading case: Torres v. Seaboard Foods, LLC, 2016 OK 20 (Okla. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Torres v. Seaboard Foods, LLC, 2016 OK 20 (Okla. 2016). · cites it 2× “3d 1041, 1046 , citing 15 O.S.2011 § 60; Bloch v. Morgan , 1926 OK 163 , 244 P.”

Croslin v. Enerlex, Inc., 308 P.3d 1041 (Okla. 2013). · cites it 2× “15 O.S.2001, § 60, now 15 O.S.2011, § 60 provides: "Actual fraud is always a question of fact.”

Bowman v. Presley, 2009 OK 48 (Okla. 2009). “" 15 O.S.2001 § 60. 27 . LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc.”

Moore v. Bob Howard German Imports, 2023 OK CIV APP 14 (Okla. Civ. App. 2023). “If true, that would constitute actual fraud. See 15 O.S. § 58(1)(defining fraud as "[t]he suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true").”

Torres v. Seaboard Foods, LLC, 2016 OK 20 (Okla. 2016). · cites it 4× “3d 1041, 1046, citing 15 O.S.2011 § 60; Bloch v. Morgan , 1926 OK 163, 244 P.”

Moore v. Bob Howard German Imports, 531 P.3d 657 (Okla. Civ. App. 2023). “§ 58 15 O.S. § 60 Bradley v. Clark , 1990 OK 73 804 P.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.