Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 20, § 1658 (2026)

Investigation of complaints

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The Council on Judicial Complaints shall promptly investigate all complaints received by it, and shall determine the proper disposition thereof, as provided in Sections 1651 through 1661 of this title. B. The Council shall have power to hold hearings, administer oaths or affirmations, receive testimony and other evidence, and issue and serve or cause to be served subpoenas requiring testimony or the production of books, records, papers or other tangible evidence. C. 1. Subject to funding limitations provided by law, the Council, as needed, may retain, by contract, a court reporter and, as needed, may retain an attorney by contract with either the Office of the Attorney General or other counsel. 2. No person acting as counsel to the Council on Judicial Complaints shall be eligible for election or appointment to the Judicial Nominating Commission during the term of his or her employment or contract for services. D. The Council is hereby authorized to require in aid of its investigatory functions the services of the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation as provided for in Section 150.34 of Title 74 of the Oklahoma Statutes or of any governmentally supported investigatory agency or, upon authorization of the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma Bar Association, of the services of the Oklahoma Bar Association. E. In the event of contemptuous refusal to obey its lawful orders, the Council may take steps necessary to maintain order in its session; as to contempts not affecting the maintenance of order, it shall certify the matter to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, which shall assign the case for trial and appropriate disposition to a judge of a district court. In a contempt proceeding in district court, the counsel for the Council on Judicial Complaints shall act as prosecutor against the alleged contemnor. F. 1. All proceedings under this section shall be held in secrecy to the same extent as proceedings before a grand jury. 2. A complainant or a witness appearing before the Council who reveals or causes to be revealed to the public any information about a proposed or pending judicial complaint shall be subject to a fine not to exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). The Council on Judicial Complaints shall promulgate rules pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act governing proceedings under this subsection. 3. In addition to the fine provided for in paragraph 2 of this subsection, any judicial officer who reveals or causes to be revealed any information about a proposed or pending judicial complaint shall be subject to public reprimand by the Court on the Judiciary.

Added by Laws 1974, c. 251, § 8, emerg. eff. May 23, 1974. Amended by Laws 1997, c. 239, § 10, eff. July 1, 1997; Laws 1998, c. 368, § 7, eff. July 1, 1998; Laws 1999, c. 423, § 6, emerg. eff. June 10, 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case: Nichols v. Council on Jud. Complaints, 615 P.2d 280 (Okla. 1980).
Nichols v. Council on Jud. Complaints, 615 P.2d 280 (Okla. 1980). · cites it 6× “NOTES [1] Enacted as Title XI of the Financial Regulatory Act, 12 U.”
Council on Jud. Complaints v. Maley, 607 P.2d 1180 (Okla. 1980). · cites it 4× “20 O.S.Supp. 1979, § 1658, provides as follows: "The Council shall promptly investigate all complaints received by it, and shall determine the proper disposition thereof, as provided in this act.”
In re Complaint Against \Judge Anonymous\"", 590 P.2d 1181 (Okla. 1978). · cites it 3× “CAN A JUDGE AGAINST WHOM COMPLAINT IS MADE BE COMPELLED TO APPEAR AND TESTIFY IN OBEDIENCE TO SUBPOENA ISSUED BY THE COUNCIL? We again turn to 20 O.S.Supp.1974, § 1658, and read: “The Council shall promptly investigate all complaints received by it, and shall determine the…”
In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceedings Concerning Coleman, 2019 OK 77, 454 P.3d 1280. “Pursuant to 20 O.S.2011, § 1658, the Council recommended her removal and referred the matter to this Court for further proceedings.”
Mattingly v. Court on the Judiciary, 8 P.3d 943 (Okla. Ct. Jud. 2000). “In 1999 the Legislature again amended 20 O.S. § 1658 and eliminated the power of the Council on Judicial Complaints to issue reprimands and admonitions under any circumstances.”
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oba v. Durbin, 2025 OK 77. · cites it 9× “20 O.S.2021, §1658 Count V ¶105 A lawyer, Burke, filed on behalf of his client, a candidate for Tulsa City Council, a petition alleging election irregularity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.