Okla. Stat. » Title 21 — CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1173 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 21-1173v1 (HB 1413, Laws 2025, c. 145, § 1) OS 21-1173v2 (HB 2104, Laws 2025, c. 486, § 118)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: v. Burgandine, 2020 COA 142 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
v. Burgandine, 2020 COA 142 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 16-5-90 (a)(1) (West 2019) (defining “contact” as “any communication including without being limited to communication in person, by telephone, by mail, by broadcast, by computer, by computer network, or by any other electronic device”); Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1173 (F)(4)(e),…”
State v. Saunders, 886 P.2d 496 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “On November 22, 1993, Appellee filed a Motion to Dismiss before trial alleging 21 O.S.Supp.1993, § 1173 is unconstitutional.”
Nicholson v. State, 963 N.E.2d 1096 (Ind. 2012). “048 (West 2007); Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 1173 (2002); Cal.Penal Code § 646.”
Irwin v. State, 2018 OK CR 21 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “LEWIS, VICE PRESIDING JUDGE: ¶ 1 James Richard Irwin, Appellant, was tried in a non-jury trial and convicted of Count 1, felony stalking, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2015, § 1173 ; and Counts 4 through 7, violation of a protective order, a misdemeanor, in violation of 22 O.”
United States v. Saunders, 59 M.J. 1 (C.A.A.F. 2003). “15, 2003); Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1173 (LEXIS through 2003 Supp.”
State v. Bryan, 910 P.2d 212 (Kan. 1996). “§ 2C: 12-10 (West 1995); Okla Stat. tit. 21, § 1173 (1996 Supp.); R.”
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Shanbour, 2003 OK 116 (Okla. 2003). · cites it 2× “The charges to which respondent plead and on which he was convicted and sentenced were one count of stalking in violation of 21 O.S. § 1173 and nine felony counts of either distribution or attempted distribution of obscene or indecent material in violation of 21 O.”
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Wilcox, 2014 OK 1 (Okla. 2014). · cites it 30× “¶47 This Court previously examined the appropriate discipline for an attorney convicted of stalking in violation of 21 O.S. §1173 in State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v.”
Sanchez-lopez, 27 I. & N. Dec. 256 (2018). “211 (A) (West 1996); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1173 (F)(1) (West 1996); 18 Pa.”
Irwin v. State, 2018 OK CR 21 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “He also pled guilty before trial to Count 2, assault and battery, and Count 3, malicious injury to property. The Honorable Mark R. Smith, District Judge, sentenced Irwin to five (5) years imprisonment and a $1,000 fine in Count 1; ninety (90) days imprisonment, a $1,000.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1173(A) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Wilcox, 2014 OK 1 (Okla. 2014). “¶47 This Court previously examined the appropriate discipline for an attorney convicted of stalking in violation of 21 O.S. §1173 in State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1173(A)(1) — 2 cases
Irwin v. State, 2018 OK CR 21 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “LEWIS, VICE PRESIDING JUDGE: ¶ 1 James Richard Irwin, Appellant, was tried in a non-jury trial and convicted of Count 1, felony stalking, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2015, § 1173 ; and Counts 4 through 7, violation of a protective order, a misdemeanor, in violation of 22 O.”
Irwin v. State, 2018 OK CR 21 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “He also pled guilty before trial to Count 2, assault and battery, and Count 3, malicious injury to property. The Honorable Mark R. Smith, District Judge, sentenced Irwin to five (5) years imprisonment and a $1,000 fine in Count 1; ninety (90) days imprisonment, a $1,000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.