Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1451 (2026)
See the following versions:
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
OS 21-1451v1 (HB 2751, Laws 2016, c. 221, § 1) OS 21-1451v2 (HB 2104, Laws 2025, c. 486, § 233)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1958–2026 · leading case: Morrison v. State, 792 P.2d 1189 (Okla. Crim. App. 1990).
Wilds v. State, 545 P.2d 779 (Okla. Crim. App. 1976). “, embezzlement and related crimes against the State are treated ; embezzlement and related crimes against an individual or private corporation or partnership are treated in 21 O.S.1971 § 1451 et seq.”
Morrison v. State, 792 P.2d 1189 (Okla. Crim. App. 1990). “21 O.S.1981, § 1451. Oklahoma has five distinct statutes under which a person may be charged with the crime of embezzlement.”
Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Coach Lines v. Meister, 330 P.2d 579 (Okla. 1958). “Our statutes provide that this offense is the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom it has been entrusted, 21 O.S.1951 § 1451, and that an intent to restore the property taken is no defense, or grounds for mitigation of punishment unless restored prior to an…”
Marton v. State, 809 P.2d 671 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). “21 O.S.1981, § 1451. Oklahoma has five distinct statutes under which a person may be charged with the crime of embezzlement.”
Francis v. State, 2020 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2020). “By agreement of both parties, the trial court ordered the sentences stayed pending this appeal.”
Rathbun v. State, 506 P.2d 983 (Okla. Crim. App. 1973). “Title 21 O.S., § 1451, defines Embezzlement as follows : “Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom it has been entrusted.”
Mason v. State, 756 P.2d 612 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “CRF-83-3, and found guilty of Embezzlement, After Former Conviction of a Felony, in violation of 21 O.S.1981, § 1451 and 21 O.S.1981, § 51(A)(2), now amended as 21 O.”
Oklahoma Ex Rel. State Bd. of Examiners of Certified Courtroom Interpreters v. Alvarado, 2025 OK 69 (Okla. 2025). “" ¶5 On January 12, 2023, Respondent was charged by information with one count of felony embezzlement in violation of 21 O.S. § 1451 nolo contendere and was found guilty as charged.”
Hughes v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 413 P.2d 543 (Okla. 1966). “Title 21 O.S.1961, § 1451, provides that embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom it has been entrusted.”
Burgess v. Johnson (N.D. Okla. 2021). “57 ; (2) breach of common law fiduciary duties; (3) common law conversion; (4) embezzlement, Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1451 ; (5) civil theft, Colo.”
State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oba v. Kline, 2026 OK 10 (Okla. 2026). “CF-2026-4 with two counts of Felony Embezzlement in violation of 21 O.S. §1451 ¶4 Complainant states that the 11 count felony charges against Respondent are directly related to Respondent's license to practice law and that the misconduct violates Rules 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.