Okla. Stat. » Title 21 — CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 650 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 21-650v1 (SB 369, Laws 2025, c. 32, 1) OS 21-650v2 (HB 2104, Laws 2025, c. 486, § 16)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1977–1987 · leading case: Sullinger v. State, 675 P.2d 472 (Okla. Crim. App. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sullinger v. State, 675 P.2d 472 (Okla. Crim. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “21 O.S.1981, § 650. Appellant asserts as his first proposition of error that the trial court committed reversible error in submitting the felony murder theory to the jury.”
Cantrell v. State, 561 P.2d 973 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). “CRF-77-71, with the offense of Aggravated Assault and Battery Upon a Police Officer, in violation of 21 O.S.1971, § 650. The defendant was tried by jury and convicted of the lesser included offense of Assault and Battery Upon a Police Officer in violation of 21 O.”
Snyder v. State, 738 P.2d 548 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987). “In support of this argument, appellant cites 21 O.S.1981, § 650(A), which defines police officers.”
Marshall v. State, 646 P.2d 611 (Okla. Crim. App. 1982). “Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is modified from a term of two (2) years’ imprisonment and a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for Aggravated Assault and Battery upon a Police Officer, in violation of 21 O.S.1981, § 650, to a sentence of six (6) months’ in the county…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 650(A): 2 cases
Sullinger v. State, 675 P.2d 472 (Okla. Crim. App. 1984). “21 O.S.1981, § 650. Appellant asserts as his first proposition of error that the trial court committed reversible error in submitting the felony murder theory to the jury.”
Snyder v. State, 738 P.2d 548 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987). “In support of this argument, appellant cites 21 O.S.1981, § 650(A), which defines police officers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.