Okla. Stat. » Title 25 — DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 25, § 301 (2026)

Citation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This act shall be known as the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act. Added by Laws 1977, c. 214, § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 1977.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Shero v. City of Grove, Okl., 510 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Shero v. City of Grove, Okl., 510 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “Shero again spoke at a city council meeting, this time to voice his objections to being denied council packets and to allege that the council violated the Oklahoma Open Meetings Act ("OOMA"), Okla. Stat. tit. 25, § 301 . II Aplt.App.”
Petition of Univ. Hospitals Auth., 953 P.2d 314 (Okla. 1998). · cites it 4× “¶ 12 Protestants raise two issues into which we shall inquire: (1) Did Petitioners violate the Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S.1991 §§ 301, et seq., and the Open Records Act, 51 O.”
Cox v. Dawson, 911 P.2d 272 (Okla. 1996). · cites it 2× “; in compliance with the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S. Sections 301 et seq. and the Oklahoma *278 Open Records Act, 51 O.”
Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Grand River Dam Auth., 720 P.2d 713 (Okla. 1986). · cites it 2× “The responsibility for generating a community climate favorable to charging public officers with disciplinary, civil or criminal transgressions is not reposed in this court.”
Oklahoma Ass'n of Mun. Attorneys v. State, 577 P.2d 1310 (Okla. 1978). · cites it 2× “77-222) wherein he concluded that under our new “Open Meeting Act” (25 O.S.Supp.1977, § 301 et seq.) “a public body 1 may not meet in executive session for the purpose of privately conferring with the lawyers representing the body.”
Monson v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 673 P.2d 839 (Okla. 1983). “25 O.S.1981 §§ 301 et seq. 4 . The terms of Art.”
Sanders v. Benton, 579 P.2d 815 (Okla. 1978). “Oklahoma’s present “Open Meeting Laws” are 25 O.S.Supp. 1977, § 301 et seq.”
Jackson Cnty. Emergency Med. Serv. Dist. v. Kirkland, 2024 OK 4 (Okla. 2024). · cites it 2× “The board holds regular monthly meetings which are open to the public and governed by the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S. 2021 §§301 et seq . 12 ¶16 Jackson County levies ad valorem taxes designated to JCEMSD for its operation and support.”
In re the Oklahoma Tpk. Auth., 770 P.2d 16 (Okla. 1989). “The individual protesters contended in their brief filed December 14, with this Court, that the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority undertook two material actions toward issuance of the revenue bonds in violation of the Act, 25 O.S.Supp.1987 § 301 et seq., which render the actions taken…”
Carl v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Oklahoma, 577 P.2d 912 (Okla. 1978). “Oklahoma’s present “Open Meeting Laws” are 25 O.S.Supp. 1977, § 301 et seq. 2 . The Trial court concluded: “Admissions board found not to be a ‘governing’ or policy-making body of the O.”
Okmulgee Cnty. Rural Water Dist. No. 2 v. Beggs Pub. Works Auth., 2009 OK CIV APP 51 (Okla. Civ. App. 2009). “In this accelerated review proceeding, Okmul-gee complains the trial court erred in holding Beggs' violation of the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act (OMA), 25 O.S. §§ 301, et seq., § 303, rendered its Water Purchase Contract with Beggs unenforceable.”
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Bd. of Med. Licensure & Supervision v. Migliaccio, 917 P.2d 483 (Okla. Civ. App. 1996). “25 O.S.1991 §§ 301 et seq. 3 . Laws 1988, c.”
Show all 27 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.