Provision for income assignment. A. Every order providing for the support of a minor child or a modification of such order, whether issued by a district court or an
administrative court, shall contain an immediate income assignment provision if child support services are being provided under the state child support plan as provided under Section 237 of Title 56 of the Oklahoma Statutes, regardless of whether support payments by such parent are in arrears. B. In all child support cases arising out of an action for divorce, paternity or other proceeding in which services are not being provided under the state child support plan, the district court shall order the wage of the obligor subject to immediate income assignment, regardless of whether support payments by such parent are in arrears, unless: 1. One of the parties demonstrates and the district court finds there is good cause not to require immediate income withholding; or 2. A written agreement is reached between the parties which provides for an alternative arrangement. C. The obligated party may execute a voluntary income assignment at any time. The voluntary assignment shall be filed with the district or administrative court and shall take effect after service on the payor, as required by Section 1171.3 of Title 12 of the Oklahoma Statutes. Added by Laws 1985, c. 297, § 17, operative Oct. 1, 1985. Renumbered from Title 12, § 1277.4 by Laws 1989, c. 333, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1989. Amended by Laws 1994, c. 365, § 11, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Laws 1997, c. 402, § 12, eff. July 1, 1997.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases, 2000–2019 · leading case:
Barnes v. Barnes, 2005 OK 1, 107 P.3d 560.
Barnes v. Barnes, 2005 OK 1, 107 P.3d 560.
· cites it 2× “ing to the person entitled by the obligor pursuant to a child support order, including but not limited to medical insurance or health care premiums and other medical expenses, current child care obligations, child care arrearages and any fixed child care obligations and such…”
In re Adoption of LDS, 2006 OK 80, 155 P.3d 1.
“" Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 115 (A) (2001). [4] Today's decision is based on the reasoning that natural parents' inability to comply with their child support obligation resulted from the misdirection of counsel, DHS, and the trial court.”
Staton v. Shuler, 2006 OK 80, 155 P.3d 1.
“" Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 115 (A) (2001). . Today's decision is based on the reasoning that natural parents' inability to comply with their child support obligation resulted from the misdirection of counsel, DHS, and the trial court.”
Malicoate v. Stand. Life & Accident Ins. Co., 2000 OK CIV APP 37, 999 P.2d 1103.
“According to 43 O.S.Supp.1994 § 115(B), the law in effect when the parties executed the Contract, the Legislature required the district court to order the wages of any parent ordered to pay child support be subject to immediate income assignment regardless of whether support…”
In re the Marriage of Teague, 2020 OK CIV APP 1.
“5 The Morgan court emphasized that the Legislature expressly provided that 43 O.S. §115, which addresses income assignments, applied to modification of disabled adult child support under 43 O.”
In re the Marriage of Teague, 2020 OK CIV APP 1.
“5 The Morgan court emphasized that the Legislature expressly provided that 43 O.S. §115, which addresses income assignments, applied to modification of disabled adult child support under 43 O.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 115(B): 1 case
Malicoate v. Stand. Life & Accident Ins. Co., 2000 OK CIV APP 37, 999 P.2d 1103.
“According to 43 O.S.Supp.1994 § 115(B), the law in effect when the parties executed the Contract, the Legislature required the district court to order the wages of any parent ordered to pay child support be subject to immediate income assignment regardless of whether support…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.