Okla. Stat. » Title 43 — MARRIAGE AND FAMILY
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 551-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

SHORT TITLE This act may be cited as the "Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act". Added by Laws 1998, c. 407, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1998.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case: Hammer v. State, 2022 OK 80, 519 P.3d 91.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hammer v. State, 2022 OK 80, 519 P.3d 91. · cites it 5× “The petition asserted the State's exercise of jurisdiction was proper pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act, 43 O.S. 2011, §§ 551-101 et seq. , and 10A O.”
Antini v. Antini, 2019 OK 20. · cites it 3× “ON CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, DIVISION I ¶0 In this writ of habeas corpus action brought under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act ("UCCJEA"), Okla. Stat. tit. 43, §§ 551-101 through 402 (2011), prevailing party appeals trial court's order…”
Antini v. Antini, 440 P.3d 57 (Okla. 2019). · cites it 2× “Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 551-101 , Official Comment (2011); see also , Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (1968) § 1.”
S.W. v. Duncan, 2001 OK 39, 24 P.3d 846. “), 43 O.S.Supp.1998 §§ 551-101 to 551-402, inclusive, provides for appeals from a "final order" issued in a proceeding pursuant to certain provisions of that Act not applicable here.”
Poppinga v. Wallace, 2025 OK 17, 565 P.3d 413. “Because there is no longer any determination of paternity, the matter is remanded for the trial court (1) to reconsider Mother's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction--particularly in light of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), 43 O.S.2021,…”
In re MCM, 2008 OK CIV APP 29, 180 P.3d 688. “Mother also asserts the trial court's order lacks findings of compliance with the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act, and the Oklahoma Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, 43 O.S. § 551-101, et seq., as well as specific findings concerning the Children's full legal…”
In re N.a.; State of Oklahoma v. Maldonado, 2025 OK 22, 567 P.3d 374. · cites it 9× “ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TEXAS COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA HONORABLE CHRISTINE MARIE LARSON, ASSOCIATE DISTRICT JUDGE ¶0 This appeal concerns whether an Oklahoma district court has jurisdiction over a juvenile deprived proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody…”
Jones v. Pack, 2018 OK CIV APP 3, 408 P.3d 628. · cites it 3× “The UCCJEA, found at 43 O.S.2011 §§ 551-101 through 551-402, contains two statutes allowing the award of attorney fees.”
In the Matter of the Adoption of B.T.S., 2016 OK CIV APP 21. “Mother's argument is based on what she contends is the proper interpretation of Oklahoma's Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), 43 O.S. 2011 §§ 551-101 through 551-402 as it relates to 10 O.”
In re S.E., 838 S.E.2d 328 (N.C. 2020). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 43 §§ 551-101–402 (2019).”
In re S.E., 838 S.E.2d 328 (N.C. 2020). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 43 §§ 551-101–402 (2019).”
In re Stephanie Nacole Sherburne, No. 03-03-00364-CV (Tex. App.—Austin July 23, 2003). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 43, §§ 551-101 to 551-402 (2002).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.