The following words and phrases when used in this title shall, for the purpose of this title, have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this chapter, except when the context otherwise requires or other definitions are provided. Section captions are a part of this chapter. Added by Laws 1961, p. 315, § 1-101, eff. Sept. 1, 1961. Amended by Laws 1981, c. 295, § 1, emerg. eff. June 29, 1981.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1984–2004 · leading case:
State v. Wakole, 959 P.2d 882 (Kan. 1998).
State v. Wakole, 959 P.2d 882 (Kan. 1998).
“The Uniform Vehicle Code, Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1-101 et seq. (1988) covers, among other things, operator’s licenses, rules of the road, and the Oklahoma Vehicle License and Registration Act.”
Cascio v. State ex rel. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 686 P.2d 282 (Okla. 1984).
“We held that under the rule in Lewis — that a public drunk charge was not related to the use of a motor vehicle and could not be used by the State against the driver — evidence of undue hardship likewise is inadmissible and may not be used by the operator as a basis for…”
Justus v. State ex rel. DPS, 2002 OK 46, 61 P.3d 888.
“, and HODGES, KAUGER, and WINCHESTER, JJ., dissent. NOTES [1] This is but a short excerpt of § 753, but it is the only language of § 753 that is material to the narrow issue in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.