Okla. Stat. » Title 47 — MOTOR VEHICLES
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1113 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 47-1113v1 (SB 2035, Laws 2024, c. 236, § 8). OS 47-1113v2 (SB 2038, Laws 2024, c. 452, § 72).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1998–2015 · leading case: Cressman v. Thompson, 798 F.3d 938 (10th Cir. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cressman v. Thompson, 798 F.3d 938 (10th Cir. 2015). · cites it 5× “See Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1113 . 5 Indeed, concealing a state-issued license plate is a misdemeanor under Oklahoma law.”
Cressman v. Thompson, 719 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “Cressman reviewed Section 4-107, as well as Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1113 (“Section 1113”).”
United States v. Schmitt Degasso, 369 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir. 2004). “As to the stop, the court concluded: [P]ursuant to 47 O.S.Supp.2001, §§ 1113(A)(2) and 12-217, Trooper Ca-son lawfully stopped Defendants’ vehicle when he observed the vehicle’s fog lamps illuminated during daylight hours when no fog was present, and because he was unable to…”
United States v. Vargas, 57 F. App'x 394 (10th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2× “Oklahoma Highway Patrol Trooper Colby Cason stopped Vargas for an improper tag display, in violation of Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 47, § 1113 (A)(2). 1 Trooper Cason informed Vargas that he would issue a warning citation.”
United States v. Wilkinson, 633 F.3d 938 (10th Cir. 2011). “” Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1113 (A)(2) (2008).”
State v. Wakole, 959 P.2d 882 (Kan. 1998). “The Uniform Vehicle Code, Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1-101 et seq. (1988) covers, among other things, operator’s licenses, rules of the road, and the Oklahoma Vehicle License and Registration Act.”
United States v. Wilkinson, 526 F. App'x 874 (10th Cir. 2013). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1113 (A)(2); Lawton, Okla.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1113(A)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Schmitt Degasso, 369 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir. 2004). “As to the stop, the court concluded: [P]ursuant to 47 O.S.Supp.2001, §§ 1113(A)(2) and 12-217, Trooper Ca-son lawfully stopped Defendants’ vehicle when he observed the vehicle’s fog lamps illuminated during daylight hours when no fog was present, and because he was unable to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.