Okla. Stat. » Title 51 — OFFICERS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 251 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This act may be cited as the “Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act”. Added by Laws 2000, c. 272, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2000.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 2004–2016 · leading case: Combs v. Homer-Ctr. Sch. Dist., 540 F.3d 231 (3rd Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Combs v. Homer-Ctr. Sch. Dist., 540 F.3d 231 (3rd Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “Art I, § 3.01. The Pennsylvania RFPA became effective December 9, 2002.”
Cressman v. Thompson, 719 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir. 2013). “Cressman also asserted a violation of the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 251 et seq. 6 The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act claim and dismissed it without prejudice.”
Ralph Harrison Benning v. William F. Amideo, 391 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2004). “35/1-35/99; Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 51, section 251, and two states in this circuit, Ala.”
Griffith v. Caney Valley Pub. Schs., 157 F. Supp. 3d 1159 (N.D. Okla. 2016). “In response, Griffith brought this action against the school district and its superintendent, Rick Peters, alleging that the school violated her rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as well as the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act, 51 O.S. § 251 et…”
Cressman v. Thompson (10th Cir. 2013). “Cressman also asserted a violation of the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 251 et seq. 6 The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act claim and dismissed it without prejudice.”
Shrum v. City of Coweta, Okla., 558 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (E.D. Okla. 2008). “Okla. Stat. tit. 51 § 251, et seq. However, this placement in the statutes does not necessarily answer the issue.”
Combs v. Homer Ctr Sch Dist (3rd Cir. 2008). “§§ 28-22-1 to 28-22-5; Okla. Stat. tit. 51 §§ 251 to 258; R.I. Gen.”
Combs v. Homer Ctr Sch Dist (3rd Cir. 2008). “§§ 28-22-1 to 28-22-5; Okla. Stat. tit. 51 §§ 251 to 258; R.I. Gen.”
Cressman v. Thompson (10th Cir. 2013). “Cressman also asserted a violation of the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 251 et seq. 6 The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act claim and dismissed it without prejudice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.