The common jails in the several counties in the charge of the respective sheriffs, shall be used as prisons: 1. For the detention of persons charged with offenses, and duly committed for trial. 2. For the detention of persons who may be duly committed, to secure their attendance as witnesses on the trial of any criminal cause. 3. For the confinement of persons pursuant to a sentence, upon a conviction for an offense and of all other persons duly committed for any cause authorized by law. 4. For the confinement of persons who may be sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison, until they shall be removed thereto. R.L. 1910, § 4580.
Notes of Decisions
Hillcrest Med. Ctr. v. State ex rel. Dep't of Corr., 675 P.2d 432 (Okla. 1983).
“57 O.S.1981 § 42(3) states that persons are properly confined in a county jail when the purpose of the confinement is to hear additional charges against him; therefore, the county sheriff is responsible for their needs.”
Oklahoma Dept. of Corr. v. Byrd, 2023 OK 97, 542 P.3d 845.
· cites it 2× “For the confinement of persons pursuant to a sentence, upon a conviction for an offense and of all other persons duly committed for any cause authorized by law.”
Oklahoma Dept. of Corr. v. Byrd, 2023 OK 97, 542 P.3d 845.
· cites it 2× “57 O.S. § 42. 2 The Department of Corrections shall reimburse any county which is required to retain an inmate pursuant to subsection E of Section 37 of this title in an amount not to exceed Twenty-seven Dollars ($27.”
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Steve Kunzweiler, Dist. Attorney, Dist. 14, 2015 OK AG 4 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2015).
· cites it 3× “57 O.S.2011, § 42. The Oklahoma State Department of Health is authorized to promulgate standards for the operation of county jails according to certain criteria provided by statute, and is required to inspect the jails at least one time each year to ensure compliance therewith.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 42(3): 2 cases
Hillcrest Med. Ctr. v. State ex rel. Dep't of Corr., 675 P.2d 432 (Okla. 1983).
“57 O.S.1981 § 42(3) states that persons are properly confined in a county jail when the purpose of the confinement is to hear additional charges against him; therefore, the county sheriff is responsible for their needs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.