Okla. Stat. » Title 57 — PRISONS AND REFORMATORIES
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 582 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 57-582v1 (HB 3936, Laws 2024, c. 59, § 41). OS 57-582v2 (HB 3450, Laws 2024, c. 151, § 14).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Butler v. Jones ex rel. State ex rel. Oklahoma Dep't of Corr., 321 P.3d 161 (Okla. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Butler v. Jones ex rel. State ex rel. Oklahoma Dep't of Corr., 321 P.3d 161 (Okla. 2013). · cites it 8× “Butler now to register denies him equal protection of the law under the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and under Art.”
State v. Smith, 2010 WI 16 (Wis. 2010). · cites it 2× “2009); Oklahoma: Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 57, § 582 (West 2004 & Supp.”
Starkey v. Oklahoma Dep't of Corr., 305 P.3d 1004 (Okla. 2013). “at 980; 57 O.S.2011, § 582. . Registered sex offenders may not live near schools, parks, playgrounds, or child care centers, nor may they work in schools, certain law enforcement capacities, or reside with other, non-family registered sex offenders.”
State v. Hurt, 2014 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “57 O.S.Supp.1989, § 582. ¶10 We review the amendments to § 583(C) under the presumption against retroactive application and Legislature's original expression of prospective effect within the Act.”
People v. Adams, 555 N.E.2d 761 (Ill. App. Ct. 1990). · cites it 2× “02 (Baldwin 1989); Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 582 (1989); Utah Code Ann.”
Dewalt v. State, 426 S.W.3d 100 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). “§ 29-11A-3 (2013) (although the 2013 amendment deleted the parental kidnapping exception to sex offender registration, a person convicted of kidnapping need only register if the kidnapping was committed with the intent to inflict a sexual offense); N.”
Donaldson v. City of El Reno, 2025 OK 9 (Okla. 2025). · cites it 13× “See 57 O.S., § 582 Starkey , 2013 OK 43 See id.”
Nitz v. State, 2017 OK CIV APP 20 (Okla. Civ. App. 2017). · cites it 9× “The court included ten numbered findings (emphasis and citations omitted): 1) Nitz was convicted in May 2006 of misdemeanor third degree sexual assault in Nebraska; 2) Nitz entered Oklahoma in February 2009 and was subject to registration under the version of 57 O.S. §582 in…”
Asagwara v. Gonzales, 205 F. App'x 644 (10th Cir. 2006). “See Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 57, § 582 (West Supp.”
State v. Hurt, 2014 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “57 O.S.Supp.1989, § 582. ¶10 We review the amendments to § 583(C) under the presumption against retroactive application and Legislature's original expression of prospective effect within the Act.”
Bingley v. Whitten (E.D. Okla. 2020). “Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 582 (A). The Act requires that before a person who is subject to the Act is released from a correctional institution, the Department of Corrections “shall determine the level of risk to the community .”
Roppolo v. Farris (E.D. Okla. 2022). “” Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 582 (A). Plaintiff’s complaint indicates he is residing in Colorado.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 582(BE) — 1 case
Butler v. Jones ex rel. State ex rel. Oklahoma Dep't of Corr., 321 P.3d 161 (Okla. 2013). “Butler now to register denies him equal protection of the law under the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and under Art.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 582(E) — 2 cases
Butler v. Jones ex rel. State ex rel. Oklahoma Dep't of Corr., 321 P.3d 161 (Okla. 2013). “Butler now to register denies him equal protection of the law under the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and under Art.”
Nitz v. State, 2017 OK CIV APP 20 (Okla. Civ. App. 2017). “The court included ten numbered findings (emphasis and citations omitted): 1) Nitz was convicted in May 2006 of misdemeanor third degree sexual assault in Nebraska; 2) Nitz entered Oklahoma in February 2009 and was subject to registration under the version of 57 O.S. §582 in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.