Okla. Stat. » Title 58 — PROBATE PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 58, § 293 (2026)

Complaint on embezzlement - Citation

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If any executor, administrator, or other person interested in the estate of a decedent, complains to the district court, on oath, that any person is suspected to have concealed, embezzled, smuggled, conveyed away, or disposed of any monies, goods or chattels of the decedent, or has in his possession or knowledge, any deeds, conveyances, bonds, contracts, or other writings which contain evidences of, or tend to disclose the right, title, interest or claim of the decedent to any real or personal estate, or any claim or demand, or any lost will, the judge may cite such person to appear before the district court, and may examine him, on oath, upon the matter of such complaint, if he can be found in the state. But if cited from another county, and he appears and is found innocent, his necessary expenses must be allowed him out of the estate. R.L.1910, § 6325.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Burton, 2021 OK 9, 482 P.3d 739.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Burton, 2021 OK 9, 482 P.3d 739. · cites it 2× “118 The Respondent never responded to the letter and on December 1, 2017, Studebaker filed an embezzlement complaint pursuant to 58 O.S. 2011, §293. The complaint alleged the Respondent received estate funds and he failed to obtain approval of the court.”
McCormick v. Barr, No. 4:20-cv-00024 (N.D. Okla. Dec. 8, 2021). · cites it 2× “At the hearing, pursuant to its authority under Okla. Stat. tit. 58, § 293 ,10 the probate court found that 9 Defendant Nowata County correctly notes that plaintiffs did not properly name the county as a defendant under Okla.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.