Okla. Stat. » Title 59 — PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 59, § 328.49 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 59-328.49v1 (HB 2104, Laws 2025, c. 486, § 530) OS 59-328.49v2 (HB 2104, Laws 2025, c. 486, § 723)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1976–2009 · leading case: Berry v. Bd. of Governors of the Registered Dentists, 611 P.2d 628 (Okla. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Berry v. Bd. of Governors of the Registered Dentists, 611 P.2d 628 (Okla. 1980). · cites it 2× “The Board is a statutory and constitutional entity, with the power to seek injunctive relief specifically granted by 59 O.S.1971 § 328.49. 1 The right *630 of the Board of Governors, as well as that of “The Registered Dentists of Oklahoma,” to bring an action for injunctive…”
Bd. of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Cryan, 638 P.2d 437 (Okla. 1981). · cites it 2× “Secondly, the appellant argues the minimum sentence provision of 59 O.S. § 328.49 is unconstitutional as applied to him because no violations of the statute had occurred for five months and a sentence for past violations does not serve the purpose of coercing present compliance…”
City of Lawton v. Barbee, 782 P.2d 927 (Okla. 1989). · cites it 2× “That case has no application to the case at bar. Although no case law construes the 1972 amendment to 12 O.”
Bd. of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Burk, 551 P.2d 1122 (Okla. 1976). “The appellant’s argument on entrapment is that while this is not a criminal prosecution as provided by 59 O.S.1971 § 328.49, the defendant may be jailed for violation of the injunction, pursuant to 12 O.”
Bd. of Governors of Registered Dentists of Oklahoma v. Spiva, 663 P.2d 735 (Okla. 1983). · cites it 5× “nt, filed in the district court an Application for Second Citation for Contempt against Appellee alleging violation of the injunction and seeking the imposition of punishment by imprisonment in the county jail for a minimum time of not less than thirty days or a maximum of not…”
State v. Twin C Convenience Store, 2009 OK CIV APP 69, 218 P.3d 529. “14 (Chiropractors); 59 O.S. § 328.49 (Dentists); 59 0.8. § 1695 (Electricians and Electrical Contractors); 59 O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.