Okla. Stat. » Title 60 — PROPERTY
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 60, § 328 (2026)

Power to alienate or encumber - Exemption from process and

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

claims. Any person having an interest in any such plan, trust or contract, or in any property or any right subject to any such plan, trust or contract, containing the provisions set forth in the next

preceding section of this act, or provisions of substantially the same force and effect, shall have no right to alienate or encumber such right or interest in any manner contrary thereto, and the interest of any such person in any such plan, trust or contract, or in any property or any right subject to any such plan, trust or contract, shall be exempt from garnishment, attachment, execution or the claims of creditors. Laws 1953 P. 344, Sec. 3.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–1990 · leading case: Greening Donald Co. v. Oklahoma Wire Rope Prods., Inc., 766 P.2d 970 (Okla. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Greening Donald Co. v. Oklahoma Wire Rope Prods., Inc., 766 P.2d 970 (Okla. 1988). · cites it 2× “The garnishee bank responded with a claim for exemption, alleging that the IRA was exempt from garnishment under 60 O.S.1981 § 328, and requesting a hearing.”
In re Ree, 114 B.R. 286 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1990). “For the statutory exemption of 60 O.S. § 328 to be effective, the plan’s or account’s own restraints on voluntary access to the funds under 60 O.”
In re Walker, 139 B.R. 31 (N.D. Okla. 1990). “The court in Goldberg took a narrow view of the exemption in 60 O.S. § 328. The debts involved herein were incurred prior to the Goldberg decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.