The following land burdens or servitudes upon land, may be attached to other land as incidents or appurtenances, and are then called easements: 1. The right of pasture; 2. The right of fishing;
3. The right of taking game; 4. The right-of-way; 5. The right of taking water, wood, minerals, and other things; 6. The right of transacting business upon land; 7. The right of conducting lawful sports upon land; 8. The right of receiving air, light, or heat from or over, or discharging the same upon or over land; 9. The right of receiving water from or discharging the same upon land; 10. The right of flooding land; 11. The right of having water flow without diminution or disturbance of any kind; 12. The right of using a wall as a party wall; 13. The right of receiving more than natural support from adjacent land or things affixed thereto; 14. The right of having the whole of a division fence maintained by a coterminous owner; 15. The right of having public conveyances stopped, or of stopping the same on land; 16. The right of a seat in church; 17. The right of burial; and 18. The right to impose limitations or affirmative obligations relating to conservation pursuant to the Uniform Conservation Easement Act. R.L.1910, § 6623. Amended by Laws 1999, c. 384, § 9, eff. Nov. 1, 1999
Notes of Decisions
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Brantley, 510 F.3d 1256 (10th Cir. 2007).
“See Okla. Stat. tit. 60, § 49 (identifying the “right of pasture” as an easement).”
Lindhorst v. Wright, 616 P.2d 450 (Okla. Civ. App. 1980).
“2d 562, 566 ; 60 O.S.1971, § 49(4). The easement was granted by a warranty deed, which is a written contract.”
Earth Prods. Co. v. Oklahoma City, 441 P.2d 399 (Okla. 1968).
“The relationship could have been considered in relation to 60 O.S.1961, §§ 49 through 59, which relates to land burdens and servitudes upon land.”
Winterringer v. Price, 370 P.2d 918 (Okla. 1961).
· cites it 2× “As heretofore pointed *922 out, the building or buildings in controversy had been constructed some 60 years prior to institution of the instant action, and due to the passage of time it was impossible to establish as a fact that an agreement had not been entered into covering…”
Grand Crest Owners Assoc. v. Stites, 2022 OK CIV APP 16 (Okla. Civ. App. 2020).
“" ¶29 But it is equally true that correlative to the access rights granted to lot owners was the right of the corporation to assess its members for the cost of maintaining the streets retained by Grand Crest.”
Johnson v. Young, 349 P.2d 761 (Okla. 1960).
“Johnson was a preference right lessee along with her husband.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 60, § 49(13): 1 case
Grand Crest Owners Assoc. v. Stites, 2022 OK CIV APP 16 (Okla. Civ. App. 2020).
“" ¶29 But it is equally true that correlative to the access rights granted to lot owners was the right of the corporation to assess its members for the cost of maintaining the streets retained by Grand Crest.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 60, § 49(4): 1 case
Lindhorst v. Wright, 616 P.2d 450 (Okla. Civ. App. 1980).
“2d 562, 566 ; 60 O.S.1971, § 49(4). The easement was granted by a warranty deed, which is a written contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.