Okla. Stat. » Title 69 — ROADS, BRIDGES, AND FERRIES
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 69, § 1101 (2026)

Letting contracts – Advertisement for bids – Contract

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

extension. A. All contracts for construction work upon the state highway system shall be let and awarded pursuant to the provisions of the Public Competitive Bidding Act of 1974. If the project advertised pursuant to the provisions of the Public Competitive Bidding Act of 1974 is for the construction of more than eight (8) miles of road, and is not a surface treatment only project, said advertisement shall provide for bids on sections of the road no longer than eight (8) miles, as well as bids on the project as a whole. If the project advertised pursuant to the provisions of the Public Competitive Bidding Act of 1974 is a surface treatment only project of more than twenty (20) miles of road, the advertisement shall provide for bids on sections of the road no longer than twenty (20) miles, as well as bids on the project as a whole. B. The Department may extend a contract no more than twenty- five percent (25%) of the length and extent of the original project. The price for the extension work shall not be greater than the contract unit basis. Added by Laws 1968, c. 415, § 1101, operative July 1, 1968. Amended by Laws 1983, c. 125, § 3, eff. Nov. 1, 1983; Laws 2007, c. 264, § 1, emerg. eff. June 4, 2007.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1998–2010 · leading case: South Tulsa Citizens Coalition, L.L.C. v. Arkansas River Bridge Auth., 2008 OK 4, 176 P.3d 1217.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
South Tulsa Citizens Coalition, L.L.C. v. Arkansas River Bridge Auth., 2008 OK 4, 176 P.3d 1217. · cites it 2× “2006 § 1705(n), 10 and 69 O.S.2001 § 1101(A); 11 and 4) ARBA is attempting to *1220 exercise authority outside the boundaries of Jenks or Bixby, in violation of 68 O.”
Glover v. Mabrey, 384 F. App'x 763 (10th Cir. 2010). “Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 69, § 1101 (2009); Okla.”
Hoar v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 1998 OK 95, 968 P.2d 1219. “and 69 O.S.1991 § 1101. The highway contract was subject to the laws of the Oklahoma, and it incorporated the provisions of the 1988 Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, Oklahoma Department of Transportation.”
M.J. Lee Constr. Co. v. Oklahoma Transp. Auth., 2005 OK 87, 125 P.3d 1205. “69 O.S.2001, §§ 1101 and 1731. . In contracting for construction work on turnpike projects, the Authority must divide the work into paving projects, bridge projects and earth-moving or miscellaneous projects according to the type of work to be done.”
MJ LEE CONST. v. Oklahoma Transp. Auth., 2005 OK 87, 125 P.3d 1205. “69 O.S.2001, §§ 1101 and 1731. [3] In contracting for construction work on turnpike projects, the Authority must divide the work into paving projects, bridge projects and earth-moving or miscellaneous projects according to the type of work to be done.”
Glover v. Mabrey, No. 08-7048 (10th Cir. June 4, 2010). “Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 69, § 1101 (2009); Okla.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 69, § 1101(A): 1 case
South Tulsa Citizens Coalition, L.L.C. v. Arkansas River Bridge Auth., 2008 OK 4, 176 P.3d 1217. “2006 § 1705(n), 10 and 69 O.S.2001 § 1101(A); 11 and 4) ARBA is attempting to *1220 exercise authority outside the boundaries of Jenks or Bixby, in violation of 68 O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.