Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 74, § 227.10 (2026)
Renumbered as Section 20 of Title 1 of the Oklahoma
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Statutes by Laws 2007, c. 359, § 22, eff. Jan. 1, 2008.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1987–1999 · leading case: Great Plains Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Dabney, 846 P.2d 1088 (Okla. 1993).
Great Plains Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Dabney, 846 P.2d 1088 (Okla. 1993). “We wish to point out we do not intimate the alleged contract is exactly like one that an ab-stractor covered by the Oklahoma Abstractors Law, 74 O.S.1991, § 227.10 et seq. might enter into or that appellees were engaged in conduct subject to that Law.”
Arbuckle Abstract Co. v. Scott, 1998 OK 125 (Okla. 1999). “buckle Abstract Company (AAC), a corporation desiring to become a licensed abstract company in Carter County? We hold the suit should have been dismissed because AAC failed to exhaust its administrative remedies before the Oklahoma Auditor and Inspector ( A & I), the State…”
Denney v. Scott, 848 P.2d 1142 (Okla. 1992). “Scott, Auditor and Inspector of the State of Oklahoma *1143 (the Auditor) in his capacity as administrator of the Oklahoma Abstractors Law, 74 O.S.Supp.1984, § 227.10 et seq. The Auditor’s order upheld the findings of a board appointed by the Auditor to hear the Den-ney’s…”
Am. First Abstract Co. v. W. Info. Sys., Inc., 735 P.2d 1187 (Okla. 1987). “This conclusion would be the same without reference to the new Oklahoma Ab-stractors Law, 74 O.S.Supp.1984, § 227.10, et seq. The product WIS proposes to sell does not fit the definition of Abstract of Title that appears in Black’s Law Dictionary: “ABSTRACT OF TITLE.”
Abstracts of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Payne Cnty. Title Co., 825 P.2d 1334 (Okla. 1992). “Scott (Auditor), in his capacity as administrator of the Oklahoma Abstractors Law, 74 O.S.Supp.1984, § 227.10 et seq., which ordered the destruction of a portion of the abstract plant compiled by appellee, Abstracts of Oklahoma, Inc.”
Am. First Abstract v. W. Info. Sys., 735 P.2d 1187 (Okla. 1987). “This conclusion would be the same without reference to the new Oklahoma Abstractors Law, 74 O.S.Supp. 1984, § 227.10, et seq. The product WIS proposes to sell does not fit the definition of Abstract of Title that appears in Black's Law Dictionary: "ABSTRACT OF TITLE.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.