Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 84, § 9 (2026)

Succession to limited legacies - Inventory of property

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where specific legacies are for life only, the first legatees must sign and deliver to the second legatee, or, if there is none, to the personal representative, an inventory of the property, expressing that the same is in his custody for life only, and that, on his decease, it is to be delivered and to remain to the use and for the benefit of the second legatee, or to the personal representative as the case may be. R.L.1910, § 8325.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: In re Initiative Petition No. 397, State Question No. 767, 2014 OK 23, 326 P.3d 496.
In re Initiative Petition No. 397, State Question No. 767, 2014 OK 23, 326 P.3d 496. · cites it 2× “The Attorney General's § 9(D) response to a ballot title is *521 statutorily effective although the Attorney General's response was filed two days late; 4, A proponent of an initiative who challenges a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General has the burden to show that the…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 84, § 9(A): 1 case
In re Initiative Petition No. 397, State Question No. 767, 2014 OK 23, 326 P.3d 496. “The Attorney General's § 9(D) response to a ballot title is *521 statutorily effective although the Attorney General's response was filed two days late; 4, A proponent of an initiative who challenges a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General has the burden to show that the…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 84, § 9(D): 1 case
In re Initiative Petition No. 397, State Question No. 767, 2014 OK 23, 326 P.3d 496. “The Attorney General's § 9(D) response to a ballot title is *521 statutorily effective although the Attorney General's response was filed two days late; 4, A proponent of an initiative who challenges a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General has the burden to show that the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.