Error in using comparables without replacement reserves
Also stated as: Harmless Error and Procedural Record Issues
5 Oregon opinions cite these pages2012–20251 page cited by Oregon courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Error in using comparables without replacement reserves
Ranked by how often Oregon courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Oregon opinions citing these pages
- Linstrom v. Lincoln Cnty. Assessor (230080N), No. TC-MD 230080N (Or. T.C. May 13, 2025)
- CCP Crestview 1505 LLC v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor, No. TC-MD 220292N (Or. T.C. Mar. 28, 2024)
- Confehr v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor, No. TC-MD 110621D (Or. T.C. Feb. 27, 2012)
- NYEI LLC v. Umatilla Cnty. Assessor, No. TC-MD 100605D (Or. T.C. Jan. 13, 2012)
- NYEI LLC v. Umatilla Cnty. Assessor, No. TC-MD 110340D (Or. T.C. Jan. 13, 2012)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Filed under: Harmless and Plain Error Analysis
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law