Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.153 (2026)

Form of notice of restitution for judgment not entered under ORS 105.146

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      105.153 Form of notice of restitution for judgment not entered under ORS 105.146. If a court entered a judgment other than pursuant to ORS 105.146, a notice of restitution issued by the clerk of the court pursuant to ORS 105.151 must be in substantially the following form:

______________________________________________________________________________

In the Circuit Court for the

County of _________

 

NOTICE OF RESTITUTION

 

Case Number _________ TO: __________________

(Defendant/Tenant)

___________________________

___________________________

___________________________

(Address of property)

 

DEADLINE TO MOVE OUT

MOVE OUT DATE: _________

 

      The Court has ordered you to move out of the property. You must move out no later than 11:59 p.m. on the Move Out Date.

      If you and everyone else living there do not move out by that time, the Sheriff will physically remove you. You must also move all of your belongings by that time. Anything you leave behind will be stored or disposed of as allowed by law.

________________________

Deputy Court Administrator

______________________________________________________________________________ [2001 c.596 §16 (105.151, 105.152, 105.153, 105.156, 105.157, 105.158, 105.159 and 105.161 enacted in lieu of 105.154)]

 

      105.154 [1995 c.559 §50 (enacted in lieu of 105.155); 1995 c.658 §70a; 1997 c.577 §§36,37; 1999 c.603 §37; repealed by 2001 c.596 §13 (105.151, 105.152, 105.153, 105.156, 105.157, 105.158, 105.159 and 105.161 enacted in lieu of 105.154)]

 

      105.155 [Amended by 1979 c.765 §6; 1985 c.588 §15; 1993 c.369 §27; repealed by 1995 c.559 §49 (105.154 enacted in lieu of 105.155)]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Balboa Apts. v. Patrick, 241 P.3d 317 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
Balboa Apts. v. Patrick, 241 P.3d 317 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “On the other hand, unlike statutes such as ORS 105.153 (providing that a judgment for restitution of premises in an FED action “must be in substantially” the prescribed form), ORS 105.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.