Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.168 (2026)

Minor as party in proceedings pertaining to residential dwellings

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      105.168 Minor as party in proceedings pertaining to residential dwellings. Notwithstanding ORCP 27 or any other provision of law, a minor, as defined in ORS 109.697 and who is a tenant as defined under ORS 90.100, may appear as a party without appointment of a guardian or guardian ad litem in an action for forcible entry or wrongful detainer, under ORS 105.100 to 105.168 regarding possession of a residential dwelling unit to which ORS chapter 90 applies, or in an action based upon a contract for a residential dwelling unit or for utility services provided to that unit. [1993 c.369 §31]

 

EASEMENT OWNER OBLIGATIONS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: 2606 Bldg. v. Mica or I Inc., 47 P.3d 12 (Or. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
2606 Bldg. v. Mica or I Inc., 47 P.3d 12 (Or. 2002). “105 to ORS 105.168. During the proceedings in the trial court, defendants sought leave to file a second amended answer that alleged the following facts.”
Frederickson v. Ditmore, 888 P.2d 108 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). “105 through ORS 105.168, Oregon’s forcible entry and detainer provisions.”
Option One Mortg. Corp. v. Wall, 977 P.2d 408 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). “105 to ORS 105.168 (1995) apply to this case. 3 Former ORS 46.”
Hoffer v. Szumski, 877 P.2d 128 (Or. Ct. App. 1994). “105 to ORS 105.168, the defendant may not “assert a counterclaim unless the right to do so is otherwise provided by statute.”
Int. Assn. Machinists v. Heil, 457 P.3d 357 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “105 to ORS 105.168. “3. Defendants are unlawfully holding the premises with force.”
Roller v. Herrera, No. 3:18-cv-00057 (D. Or. Sept. 23, 2019). · cites it 2× “105 through Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.168 , and provided contact information for Herrera’s attorney, Jill Foster, who worked for defendant Churchill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.