Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 107.810 (2026)

Policy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      107.810 Policy. It is the policy of the State of Oregon to encourage persons obligated to support other persons as the result of a dissolution or annulment of marriage or as the result of a legal separation to obtain or to cooperate in the obtaining of life insurance adequate to provide for the continued support of those persons in the event of the obligor’s death. [1981 c.775 §9]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: In re the Marriage of Mitchell, 353 P.3d 28 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re the Marriage of Mitchell, 353 P.3d 28 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “See also ORS 107.810 (“It is the policy of the State of Oregon to encourage persons obligated to support other persons as the *816 result of a dissolution or annulment of marriage or as the result of a legal separation to obtain or to cooperate in the obtaining of life insurance…”
Tupper v. Roan, 243 P.3d 50 (Or. 2010). “As evidence of that fact, plaintiff points to ORS 107.810, which provides: “It is the policy of the State of Oregon to encourage persons obligated to support other persons as the result of a dissolution * * * of marriage * * * to obtain or cooperate in the obtaining of life…”
Coates & Coates, 508 P.3d 59 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “In his third assignment of error, husband contends that the trial court erred in awarding wife attorney fees.”
Klemp v. Andrach, 335 Or. App. 187 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “, 318 Or App 772, 775 , 508 P3d 59 (2022) (concluding that the trial court acted within its discretion when it ordered that the husband maintain life insurance for the wife’s ben- efit because there was “evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that the wife…”
Boatfield v. Boatfield, 447 P.3d 35 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). “See ORS 107.810 ("It is the policy of the State of Oregon to encourage persons obligated to support other persons as the result of a dissolution * * * to obtain or to cooperate in the obtaining of life insurance adequate to provide for the continued support of those persons in…”
In re the Marriage of Jacobs, 39 P.3d 251 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “the decree shall state the court’s findings relating to net spendable income of each party if such statement is requested by either party; “(I) The amount of long-term financial obligation, including legal fees and costs; “(J) Costs of health care to a party; “(K) The standard…”
Matter of Marriage of Waterman, 974 P.2d 256 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). “r, ages, health and conditions of dependents of the parties or either of them and provisions of the decree relating to custody of the children, including the length of time child support obligations will be in effect; “(J) Costs of health care to a party; “(K) The standard of…”
McCarthy v. McCarthy, 12 P.3d 519 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). “decree shall state the court’s findings relating to net spendable income of each party if such statement is requested by either party; “(I) The amount of long-term financial obligation, including legal fees and costs; “(J) Costs of health care to a party; *188 “(K) The standard…”
In re the Marriage of Arand, 49 P.3d 799 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “es or benefits to each party and the net spendable income available to each party after accounting for such liabilities and benefits * * *; “(I) The amount of long-term financial obligation, including legal fees and costs; “(J) Costs of health care to a party; “(K) The standard…”
In re the Marriage of Dopson, 33 P.3d 1019 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). “decree shall state the court’s findings relating to net spendable income of each party if such statement is requested by either party; “(I) The amount of long-term financial obligation, including legal fees and costs; “(J) Costs of health care to a party; “(K) The standard of…”
In re the Marriage of McKinnon, 300 P.3d 257 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “The judgment further provided: “Wife has an insurable interest in Husband’s life and is authorized by ORS 107.810, et seq, to purchase insurance on Husband’s life should she decide to do so.”
In the Matter of the Marriage of Goode, 997 P.2d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). “abilities or benefits to each party and the net spendable income available to each party after accounting for such liabilities and benefits “(I) The amount of long-term financial obligation, including legal fees and costs; “(J) Costs of health care to a party; “(K) The standard…”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.