Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 107.840 (2026)

Confidentiality of Social Security numbers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      107.840 Confidentiality of Social Security numbers. (1) The State Court Administrator shall establish a procedure applicable to every court in this state that ensures that the Social Security numbers of parties to a proceeding under ORS 107.085 or 107.485 are kept confidential and exempt from public inspection.

      (2) The procedure established under this section must:

      (a) Require that Social Security numbers be listed on a separate paper attached to an affidavit or a declaration under penalty of perjury in the form required by ORCP 1 E, executed by the person providing the Social Security number, certifying that the Social Security number is correct;

      (b) Ensure that the Social Security numbers are provided to or made accessible to the entities primarily responsible for providing child support services under ORS 25.080; and

      (c) Comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 666 relating to provision of Social Security numbers. [2003 c.380 §1; 2015 c.121 §9; 2025 c.99 §58]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1988–1988 · leading case: Seim v. Soriano, 764 P.2d 591 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Seim v. Soriano, 764 P.2d 591 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). “” 2 Plaintiffs’ theory apparently is that, if defendant had notified the insurance company of the terms of the judgment, the company would have paid policy benefits in accordance with those terms. In granting summary judgment for defendant, the trial court stated that defendant…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 107.840(6) — 1 case
Seim v. Soriano, 764 P.2d 591 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). “” 2 Plaintiffs’ theory apparently is that, if defendant had notified the insurance company of the terms of the judgment, the company would have paid policy benefits in accordance with those terms. In granting summary judgment for defendant, the trial court stated that defendant…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.