109.731
Communication between courts.
(1) A court of this state may communicate with a court in another state
concerning a proceeding arising under ORS 109.701 to 109.834.
(2) The court may
allow the parties to participate in the communication. If the parties are not
able to participate in the communication, they must be given the opportunity to
present facts and legal arguments before a decision on jurisdiction is made.
(3) Communication
between courts on schedules, calendars, court records and similar matters may
occur without informing the parties. A record need not be made of the
communication.
(4) Except as
otherwise provided in subsection (3) of this section, a record must be made of
a communication under this section. The parties must be informed promptly of
the communication and granted access to the record.
(5) For the
purposes of this section, “record” means information that is inscribed on a
tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is
retrievable in perceivable form. [1999 c.649 §10]
Note: See note under 109.701.
Notes of Decisions
Dep't of Human Servs. v. G. G., 229 P.3d 621 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 6× “Another purpose of the UCCJEA is to determine whether this state is an inconvenient forum and whether another state is a more appropriate forum.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. J. S., 368 Or. 516 (Or. 2021).
“Under ORS 109.731, the juvenile court “may communicate with a court in another state concern- ing a proceeding arising under ORS 109.”
Puhl & Axel, 345 Or. App. 670 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“See also ORS 109.731(1) (providing that “[a] court of this state may communicate with a court in another state concerning a [UCCJEA] proceeding”).”
Skaug & Skaug, 348 Or. App. 38 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
· cites it 2× “, ORS 109.731 to 109.737, ORS 109.757, and ORS 109.”
Puhl & Axel, 345 Or. App. 670 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“See also ORS 109.731(1) (providing that “[a] court of this state may communicate with a court in another state concerning a [UCCJEA] proceeding”).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 109.731(1) — 3 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. G. G., 229 P.3d 621 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
“Another purpose of the UCCJEA is to determine whether this state is an inconvenient forum and whether another state is a more appropriate forum.”
Puhl & Axel, 345 Or. App. 670 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“See also ORS 109.731(1) (providing that “[a] court of this state may communicate with a court in another state concerning a [UCCJEA] proceeding”).”
Puhl & Axel, 345 Or. App. 670 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“See also ORS 109.731(1) (providing that “[a] court of this state may communicate with a court in another state concerning a [UCCJEA] proceeding”).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 109.731(2) — 1 case
Dep't of Human Servs. v. G. G., 229 P.3d 621 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
“Another purpose of the UCCJEA is to determine whether this state is an inconvenient forum and whether another state is a more appropriate forum.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 109.731(4) — 1 case
Dep't of Human Servs. v. G. G., 229 P.3d 621 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
“Another purpose of the UCCJEA is to determine whether this state is an inconvenient forum and whether another state is a more appropriate forum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.