Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 110.617 (2026)

Procedure to contest validity or enforcement of registered order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      110.617 Procedure to contest validity or enforcement of registered order. (1) A nonregistering party seeking to contest the validity or enforcement of a registered support order in this state shall request a hearing within the time required by ORS 110.614. The nonregistering party may seek to vacate the registration, to assert any defense to an allegation of noncompliance with the registered order or to contest the remedies being sought or the amount of any alleged arrearages pursuant to ORS 110.620.

      (2) If the nonregistering party fails to contest the validity or enforcement of the registered support order in a timely manner, the order is confirmed by operation of law.

      (3) If a nonregistering party requests a hearing to contest the validity or enforcement of the registered support order, the registering tribunal shall schedule the matter for hearing and give notice to the parties of the date, time and place of the hearing. [2015 c.298 §51]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: State v. Baldwin, 341 Or. App. 665 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Baldwin, 341 Or. App. 665 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “ORS 110.617(1); ORS 110.614(2)(b). Among the defenses that may be asserted to vacate the reg- istration of a support order is that “[t]he order was obtained by fraud * * *.”
State v. Baldwin, 341 Or. App. 665 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “ORS 110.617(1); ORS 110.614(2)(b). Among the defenses that may be asserted to vacate the reg- istration of a support order is that “[t]he order was obtained by fraud * * *.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 110.617(1): 2 cases
State v. Baldwin, 341 Or. App. 665 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “ORS 110.617(1); ORS 110.614(2)(b). Among the defenses that may be asserted to vacate the reg- istration of a support order is that “[t]he order was obtained by fraud * * *.”
State v. Baldwin, 341 Or. App. 665 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “ORS 110.617(1); ORS 110.614(2)(b). Among the defenses that may be asserted to vacate the reg- istration of a support order is that “[t]he order was obtained by fraud * * *.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.